Post-Doctoral Training in Pain Medicine: Too Little, Yet Not Too Late?
Scott Pritzlaff,Miles Day,Sayed Wahezi,Michael Schatman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s462429
IF: 2.8319
2024-02-19
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Scott G Pritzlaff, 1 Miles Day, 2 Sayed E Wahezi, 3 Michael E Schatman 4, 5 On behalf of Pain Medicine Luminaries 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA; 2 Traweek-Racz Endowed Professor in Pain Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Texas Tech University HSC, Lubbock, TX, USA; 3 Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Orthopedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 5 Department of Population Health – Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Correspondence: Michael E Schatman, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA, Tel +1 425-647-4880, Email As leaders in pain medicine, we stand at a crucial juncture in the evolution of our field. The challenges we face in 2024 underscore the urgency of reassessing the current structure of pain medicine fellowships. Our commitment to shaping the future of pain physicians, and, thus, the field generally, compels us to address the constraints that hinder the comprehensive training essential for the next generation. Over the past decade, pain medicine has witnessed significant changes that have profoundly affected the training of fellows. The shift away from opioid management paired with the emergence of numerous innovative therapies has added complexity to fellowship training, creating a dynamic landscape with competing educational priorities. Balancing the emphasis on conservative care and procedures has become more challenging for academic leaders due to a conflict of static educational time and significantly increased educational need. In fact, fellows must supplement their training through industry- and pain society-based education to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of both conservative treatments (such as pharmaceutical approaches, restorative therapies and psychosocial interventions) and training in the dramatically and rapidly evolving field of interventional pain medicine. 1 This holistic, balanced and multidisciplinary approach is consistent with the 2019 US Department of Health and Human Services guidance on best practices in pain management, 2 as well as with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements. 3 Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic produced challenges associated with patient volume and treatment paradigms due to decreased ancillary staffing (eg, physical and occupational therapy, psychiatry), highlighting the need for these services and adding commensurate value for increased awareness for our trainees. Amidst these changes, the landscape of procedural interventions in pain medicine has expanded considerably over recent years. Advances in neurostimulation, ablative techniques, percutaneous surgical technologies, and ultrasound application have broadened the procedural toolbox. With these interventional therapies becoming more common, training a pain fellow within the standard timeframe of one year has become notably more challenging. We opine that the current fellowship structure can provide only "introductory exposure", with the expectation that fellows will develop into competent pain physicians post-fellowship. Although the growth of our field is exciting and necessitates a demand for even more broadly skilled practitioners, new information and technical skill set demand is outpacing our ability to teach it. Furthermore, the landscape of pain medicine fellowship has undergone significant transformation in recent years, marked by a notable shift in recruitment strategies and a broadening of the candidate pool to include diverse specialties such as anesthesia, physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R), neurology, emergency medicine (EM), radiology, psychiatry, and more. This inclusivity has brought forth a wealth of unique strengths and backgrounds, enhancing the multidisciplinary nature of pain medicine teams. However, this shift also introduces a challenge, as the starting points and interventional backgrounds of fellows from different specialties can vary significantly. The 2023 National Resident Matching Program (NMRP) match reflects this evolution, yielding historically low numbers of anesthesia applicants. This trend underscores the evolving dynamics within our specialty, prompting fellowship programs to adapt and welcome candidates from a broader array of medical backgrounds. As the landscape transforms, the emphasis on embracing diversity in specialty backgrounds will likely reshape the future of pain medicine fellowship training. -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology