The selection of altruistic behaviour

R.Donato,L. Peliti,M. Serva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.adap-org/9611006

1996-11-18

Abstract:Altruistic behaviour is disadvantageous for the individual while is advantageous for its group. If the target of the selection is the individual, one would expect the selection process to lead to populations formed by wholly homogeneous groups, made up of either altruistic or egoistic individuals, where the winning choice depends on the balance beetwen group advantage and individual disadvantage. We show in a simple model that populations formed by inhomogeneous groups can be stabilized in some circumstances. We argue that this condition is realized when there is a relative advantage conferred by the presence of a few altruists to all the members of the group.

Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems,Populations and Evolution

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How can altruistic behavior be maintained in natural selection?** Specifically, the author explores how to explain the phenomenon that both altruistic individuals and selfish individuals exist simultaneously in a group under the condition of selection at the individual level.

### Main problem background

1. **Definition of altruistic behavior**:
- Altruistic behavior is disadvantageous to the individual itself but beneficial to the group to which it belongs.

2. **Limitations of traditional explanations**:
- From the perspective of individual selection, natural selection should tend to make individuals in a population either completely altruistic or completely selfish, because altruistic behavior is disadvantageous to the individual itself.
- However, the observed reality is that there are both altruistic individuals and selfish individuals in many groups, and the existence of such mixed groups is difficult to be fully explained by the traditional individual selection or kin selection theories.

### Main contributions of the paper

1. **Proposing a simple model**:
- By constructing a simple mathematical model, the author shows that in some cases, a mixed group composed of altruistic individuals and selfish individuals can stably exist.

2. **Key assumptions**:
- When there are a small number of altruistic individuals in a group, the existence of these altruistic individuals will bring relative advantages to the whole group.
- This advantage enables the mixed group to stably exist even under the pressure of individual selection.

3. **Model results**:
- The model shows that when the group advantage brought by altruistic behavior is sufficient to offset its disadvantage to the individual, the mixed group can stably exist in the population.
- In particular, for a larger group (deme), as long as there is a certain number of altruistic individuals, a stable mixed group can be formed.

### Formula summary

- **Fitness function**:
\[
f(\alpha) =
\begin{cases}
(1 - r) \cdot \frac{1}{1 - c} & \text{if the individual is an altruist and belongs to an altruistic group} \\
1 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - c} & \text{if the individual is a selfish one and belongs to an altruistic group} \\
(1 - r) & \text{if the individual is an altruist and belongs to a selfish group} \\
1 & \text{if the individual is a selfish one and belongs to a selfish group}
\end{cases}
\]
where \( r \) is the intrademic selection rate, and \( c \) is the interdemic selection rate.

- **Expected value of the number of offspring**:
\[
\nu(\alpha) = \frac{M f(\alpha)}{\sum_{\beta = 1}^M f(\beta)}
\]

- **Change in group size**:
\[
V_j = T_j \sum_{k = 0}^L T_k \rho_k(t)
\]
where
\[
T_j = \frac{1 - rj/L}{1 - c\theta(j - j^*)}
\]
and \( \theta(x) \) is the unit step function.

### Conclusion

By introducing a simple model, this paper shows that under the pressure of individual selection, a mixed group (that is, a group containing both altruistic individuals and selfish individuals) can stably exist under certain conditions. This finding provides a new perspective for understanding the evolution of altruistic behavior in nature, especially when the group size is large and the advantage of altruistic behavior is significant.