Altruism pays off in group-structured populations

Klaus F. Steiner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.20.575560

2024-01-23

Abstract:The evolution of altruistic traits is a Darwinian puzzle that has not yet been satisfactorily solved. Using cost-benefit analyses and multi-agent simulations, I show here that there is a clear fitness advantage for the altruists in a mixed population of altruists and egoists if the following conditions are met: (i) The population is segregated into groups that persist over time or several generations. (ii) The benefit achieved by altruists is only shared among the members of their own group. (iii) There is selection pressure on each individual, which is reduced by the benefit provided by altruists. (iv) The costs for an altruist are smaller than the total benefit achieved by him for all members of his group together. (v) There is already a high proportion of altruists in the population and/or the proportion of altruists varies greatly between groups. I refer this kind of population dynamics as the grouping effect, or G-effect for short. This effect is made up of two biases, which basically come about through simple individual selection: the tendency to increase the variance among the groups ( ) and the tendency to increase fitness for altruistic traits when this variance is high ( ). In this context, selection only happens at the individual level. It does not require relationships between the group members, nor does it require competition among the groups. Extended multi-agent simulations with reproduction, mutation and migration also show that altruism can exist stably in a wide range of conditions due to this G-effect.

Evolutionary Biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the **adaptive paradox of altruistic traits in evolution**. Specifically, the author explored how altruistic behavior can be maintained and spread under the pressure of natural selection in a population with a group structure.

### Main problems:
1. **Darwin's puzzle**: According to Darwin's theory of natural selection, altruistic behavior (that is, an individual pays a cost to help other individuals) seems to reduce the individual's fitness, which is not conducive to the transmission of its genes to the next generation. Therefore, the existence of altruistic behavior is in contradiction with the theory of evolution, which is known as "Darwin's puzzle".

2. **The role of group structure**: Through cost - benefit analysis and multi - agent simulation, the author showed that under certain conditions, altruism can have obvious adaptive advantages in a population with a group structure. These conditions include:
- The group remains relatively stable over time and across generations.
- The benefits brought by altruists are only shared by the members of their group.
- Each individual is under selection pressure, and this pressure is reduced due to the contribution of altruists.
- The cost of altruism is less than the total benefit it brings to the entire group.
- There is already a high proportion of altruists in the population, or there is a large difference in the proportion of altruists between different groups.

3. **G - effect (Grouping Effect)**: The author introduced the concept of "G - effect" and pointed out two biases:
- **Variation Bias**: Increase the variation between groups.
- **Fitness Bias**: When the variation between groups is large, increase the fitness of altruistic traits.

### Solutions:
Through the above conditions and mechanisms, the author proved that even without inter - group competition or kin selection, altruistic behavior can stably exist in a population with a group structure. This provides a new perspective for explaining the evolution of altruistic behavior and emphasizes the crucial role of group structure in it.

### Formula representation:
The cost - benefit relationship involved in the paper can be represented by the following formula:

\[
\text{Payoff} = \frac{\text{Benefit}}{\text{Group Size}}
\]

where:
- **Benefit** represents the total benefit that altruists bring to the group.
- **Group Size** represents the size of the group.

In addition, the change in fitness can be measured by the change in relative frequency:

\[
\Delta [C] = [C'] - [C]
\]

where:
- \([C]\) represents the proportion of altruists in the current group.
- \([C']\) represents the proportion of altruists in the next - generation group.

Through these formulas and simulation experiments, the author showed how altruistic behavior can obtain adaptive advantages under specific conditions and finally be stably spread in the group.