Abstract:While the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of most noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention and treatment interventions is well established, care delivery models and means of scaling these up in a variety of resource-constrained health systems are not. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence on the current state of implementation research on priority NCD prevention and control interventions provided by health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). On January 20, 2021, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1990 through 2020 to identify implementation research studies that focused on the World Health Organization (WHO) priority NCD prevention and control interventions targeting cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disease and provided within health systems in LMICs. Any empirical and peer-reviewed studies that focused on these interventions and reported implementation outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Given the focus on this review and the heterogeneity in aims and methodologies of included studies, risk of bias assessment to understand how effect size may have been compromised by bias is not applicable. We instead commented on the distribution of research designs and discussed about stronger/weaker designs. We synthesized extracted data using descriptive statistics and following the review protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021252969). Of 9,683 potential studies and 7,419 unique records screened for inclusion, 222 eligible studies evaluated 265 priority NCD prevention and control interventions implemented in 62 countries (6% in low-income countries and 90% in middle-income countries). The number of studies published has been increasing over time. Nearly 40% of all the studies were on cervical cancer. With regards to intervention type, screening accounted for 49%, treatment for 39%, while prevention for 12% (with 80% of the latter focusing on prevention of the NCD behavior risk factors). Feasibility (38%) was the most studied implementation outcome followed by adoption (23%); few studies addressed sustainability. The implementation strategies were not specified well enough. Most studies used quantitative methods (86%). The weakest study design, preexperimental, and the strongest study design, experimental, were respectively employed in 25% and 24% of included studies. Approximately 72% of studies reported funding, with international funding being the predominant source. The majority of studies were proof of concept or pilot (88%) and targeted the micro level of health system (79%). Less than 5% of studies report using implementation research framework. Despite growth in implementation research on NCDs in LMICs, we found major gaps in the science. Future studies should prioritize implementation at scale, target higher levels health systems (meso and macro levels), and test sustainability of NCD programs. They should employ designs with stronger internal validity, be more conceptually driven, and use mixed methods to understand mechanisms. To maximize impact of the research under limited resources, adding implementation science outcomes to effectiveness research and regional collaborations are promising.

Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators

A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study

Lessons learned about co-creation: developing a complex intervention in rural Peru

Co-creation in public health research: an introduction to basic principles

Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries

Factors influencing the scale-up of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic literature review

A review of research with co-design methods in health education

Embedding health literacy research and best practice within a socioeconomically and culturally diverse health service: A narrative case study and revised model of co-creation

Implementation research on noncommunicable disease prevention and control interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Enhanced or hindered research benefits? A realist review of community engagement and participatory research practices for non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries

Co-design of health educational materials with people experiencing homelessness and support workers: a scoping review

Achieving Research Impact Through Co‐creation in Community‐Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study

Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components

Co-creation process of an intervention to implement a multiparameter point-of-care testing device in a primary healthcare setting for non-communicable diseases in Peru

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews

Co-creation and living lab methodologies in the development of digital health interventions for lifestyle modification in patients with chronic diseases [Ovid Embase].

Social Media–Based Interventions for Health Behavior Change in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review

Co-designing digital mental health interventions with young people: 10 recommendations from lessons learned in low-and-middle-income countries

Co-creation and living lab methodologies in the development of digital health interventions for lifestyle modification in patients with chronic diseases [Web of Science].

The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co‐Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania