Abstract:POLICY POINTS: Co-creation-collaborative knowledge generation by academics working alongside other stakeholders-is an increasingly popular approach to aligning research and service development. It has potential for "moving beyond the ivory towers" to deliver significant societal impact via dynamic, locally adaptive community-academic partnerships. Principles of successful co-creation include a systems perspective, a creative approach to research focused on improving human experience, and careful attention to governance and process. If these principles are not followed, co-creation efforts may fail.CONTEXT: Co-creation-collaborative knowledge generation by academics working alongside other stakeholders-reflects a "Mode 2" relationship (knowledge production rather than knowledge translation) between universities and society. Co-creation is widely believed to increase research impact.METHODS: We undertook a narrative review of different models of co-creation relevant to community-based health services. We contrasted their diverse disciplinary roots and highlighted their common philosophical assumptions, principles of success, and explanations for failures. We applied these to an empirical case study of a community-based research-service partnership led by the Centre of Research Excellence in Quality and Safety in Integrated Primary-Secondary Care at the University of Queensland, Australia.FINDINGS: Co-creation emerged independently in several fields, including business studies ("value co-creation"), design science ("experience-based co-design"), computer science ("technology co-design"), and community development ("participatory research"). These diverse models share some common features, which were also evident in the case study. Key success principles included (1) a systems perspective (assuming emergence, local adaptation, and nonlinearity); (2) the framing of research as a creative enterprise with human experience at its core; and (3) an emphasis on process (the framing of the program, the nature of relationships, and governance and facilitation arrangements, especially the style of leadership and how conflict is managed). In both the literature review and the case study, co-creation "failures" could often be tracked back to abandoning (or never adopting) these principles. All co-creation models made strong claims for significant and sustainable societal impacts as a result of the adaptive and developmental research process; these were illustrated in the case study.CONCLUSIONS: Co-creation models have high potential for societal impact but depend critically on key success principles. To capture the nonlinear chains of causation in the co-creation pathway, impact metrics must reflect the dynamic nature and complex interdependencies of health research systems and address processes as well as outcomes.

Co-creation in public health research: an introduction to basic principles

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.

A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study

Achieving Research Impact Through Co‐creation in Community‐Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators

Understanding Co‐Creation in a Research Partnership Programme Exploring Patient‐Driven Innovations: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study

What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions

The meanings of co‐creation

Embedding health literacy research and best practice within a socioeconomically and culturally diverse health service: A narrative case study and revised model of co-creation

Co-Creation: A Novel Approach to Developing Guidelines for Research Integrity Policy – Lessons Learned from the SOPS4RI Project

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

Transforming health-care service through consumer co-creation: directions for service design

Planning, implementing and governing systems-based co-creation: the DISCOVER framework

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: Co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: Experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research

Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries

Adult co-creators' emotional and psychological experiences of the co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review protocol

Co‐Creation in Research: Further Reflections From the 'Co‐Creating Safe Spaces' Project

Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews

Lessons learned about co-creation: developing a complex intervention in rural Peru

Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components