Abstract:As works are increasingly produced by machines using artificial intelligence (AI) systems, with a result often difficult to distinguish from that of a human creator, the question of what should be the appropriate response of the legal system and, in particular, of the copyright system has become central. If the creative input of the author has traditionally been the generator of copyright protection, AI forces to reassess what in the creative process is special in human creativity and where the creative input lies in AI-generated works. But it also poses more fundamental questions on what the copyright system should achieve and who/what it should protect. In particular, as many human authors will potentially face the competition of these AI machines on the market, new ways of remunerating creators have to be imagined while making sure that the copyright system does not stand in the way of these important technological developments.This contribution analyses the copyright issues related to so-called “generative AI” systems and reviews the arguments currently advanced to change the copyright regime for AI-generated works. To do so, the underlying human rights framing intellectual property laws are used as the starting point from which a balanced copyright framework for generative AI could (and even should) be derived. It follows from the applicable human rights framework for copyright but also from the anthropocentric approach of human rights that the protection of creators and human creativity must be considered the point of reference when assessing future reforms with regard to copyright and generative AI systems. This approach establishes generative AI systems as an instrument of the human creator – and not as a substitute. It also reinforces that copyright should be a tool to protect creativity and creators, not a legal mechanism to secure the amortization of economic investments in AI technology.As a consequence, it is argued that the copyrightability of AI-generated outputs should be considered with utmost care and only when AI is used as a technical tool for creators in their creation process- meaning when they can serve a human author. At the same time, AI systems are here to stay, and their development should not be inhibited as they can have many beneficial aspects (including for creators) if appropriately regulated. The right to train generative AI systems via machine learning technology can be derived from the right to science and culture and freedom of (artistic) expression (Arts. 19 UDHR, 27.1 UDHR, 15.1 a and b ICESCR; 11 and 13 EUCF) as AI can lead to useful advancements in science and arts; moreover, it is important for human creators to be able to use outputs produced by generative AI in their creative process. This grounding is even stronger when the training is conducted for research purposes as the training process can then benefit also from the fundamental right to research-justification.However, since a large amount of copyrighted works is required for the training of generative AI systems, a remuneration obligation for these uses arises from a human rights perspective, in particular when AI systems have a commercial purpose. It follows from the right to the protection of moral and material interests of the creator (Arts. 27.2 UDHR, 15.1c) ICESCR; 17.2 EUCF, 1 Protocol No. 1, 8 ECHR) that authors must be adequately remunerated for the commercial use of their works unless there is a strong justification legitimizing the use. For this reason, it is proposed that the machine learning process using copyright-protected works to train the AI gives rise to a limitation-based remuneration right to the benefit of human creators. The article also briefly explores if and when the moral interest of creators deriving from human rights protection could justify that they oppose the use of their work for training purposes of AI systems. It is argued that the weaker the fundamental rights claim to train the AI is, the stronger the moral rights claim could be. For example, training an AI to produce works for discriminatory or racist purposes will benefit from a weaker (if any) fundamental rights protection, but will potentially raise important moral concerns of the author of the work used for training purposes. More generally, the article concludes that in order to secure a vibrant space for culture and creativity, (finally) cherishing and putting the Human Author at the center of the copyright system is necessary (and not only to built-up fences to the benefit of copyright industries). In doing so, it might be able to have in the future AI-systems that serve creators and creativity, and not the other way around.

Good Models Borrow, Great Models Steal: Intellectual Property Rights and Generative AI

Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspective

Copyright Policy Options for Generative Artificial Intelligence

Rethinking copyright exceptions in the era of generative AI: Balancing innovation and intellectual property protection

Talkin' 'Bout AI Generation: Copyright and the Generative-AI Supply Chain

Copyright Safety for Generative AI

Creating Innovation Value from Generative Ai: A Property Rights Perspective

Generative AI and US Intellectual Property Law

Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic Parrots

U Can't Gen This? A Survey of Intellectual Property Protection Methods for Data in Generative AI

Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI

Managing Copyright Infringement Risks in Generative Artificial Intelligence Data Mining

Copyright, text & data mining and the innovation dimension of generative AI

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Both Sides of the Black Box

Elaborating a Human Rights friendly Copyright Framework for Generative AI

The Research On The Ownership Of Copyright Of AI-generated Content

Assessing the Copyright Infringement Risk of Generative AI Created Works

Should We Ban Generative AI, Incentivise it or Make it a Medium for Inclusive Creativity?

The Work of Copyright in the Age of Machine Production

The Implication of Generative Artificial Intelligence towards Intellectual Property Rights (Examining the Multifaceted Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights)

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF COPYRIGHT