Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic Parrots

Advait Sarkar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3596671.3597650

2023-07-20

Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI), and in particular generative models, are transformative tools for knowledge work. They problematise notions of creativity, originality, plagiarism, the attribution of credit, and copyright ownership. Critics of generative models emphasise the reliance on large amounts of training data, and view the output of these models as no more than randomised plagiarism, remix, or collage of the source data. On these grounds, many have argued for stronger regulations on the deployment, use, and attribution of the output of these models. However, these issues are not new or unique to artificial intelligence. In this position paper, using examples from literary criticism, the history of art, and copyright law, I show how creativity and originality resist definition as a notatable or information-theoretic property of an object, and instead can be seen as the property of a process, an author, or a viewer. Further alternative views hold that all creative work is essentially reuse (mostly without attribution), or that randomness itself can be creative. I suggest that creativity is ultimately defined by communities of creators and receivers, and the deemed sources of creativity in a workflow often depend on which parts of the workflow can be automated. Using examples from recent studies of AI in creative knowledge work, I suggest that AI shifts knowledge work from material production to critical integration. This position paper aims to begin a conversation around a more nuanced approach to the problems of creativity and credit assignment for generative models, one which more fully recognises the importance of the creative and curatorial voice of the users of these models and moves away from simpler notational or information-theoretic views.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence,Computation and Language

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the impact of artificial intelligence (particularly generative models) on the creativity of knowledge work. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Creativity, Originality, Plagiarism, Attribution, and Copyright Ownership**: The emergence of generative models has complicated these concepts. Critics argue that generative models rely on large amounts of training data and view their outputs as randomized plagiarism, remixing, or collaging.

2. **Historical Background and Legal Perspectives**: The author uses examples from literary criticism, art history, and copyright law to illustrate that creativity and originality cannot be simply defined as properties of objects but can be seen as attributes of processes, authors, or audiences.

3. **Multiple Perspectives on Creativity**:
- **Process as Creativity**: Creativity lies not in the created object itself but in the method of production.
- **Author's Intent and Discourse as Creativity**: The creative content of an object needs to be understood in conjunction with the author's intent and social discourse.
- **Interpretation as Creativity**: Creativity is not a property of the object but the result of the interaction between the reader and the object.
- **Reuse as Creativity**: The uncredited reuse of previous materials is an inevitable part of any creative effort.
- **Randomness as Creativity**: Random processes themselves can be seen as a source of creativity, especially as a mechanism to separate (human) creators from their works.

4. **Transformation of Knowledge Work**: AI shifts knowledge work from material production to critical integration. The paper suggests that the application of AI in knowledge work requires a more nuanced approach that fully recognizes the importance of users' creative and curatorial voices in these models.

Overall, the paper aims to provoke a more detailed discussion on the issues of creativity and attribution in generative models, emphasizing the need to understand and evaluate the role of AI in knowledge work from multiple perspectives.