Abstract:Purpose of the study: Because children's own perception, memory and expressive powers differ significantly from those of adults, resulting in a difference between child and adult witnesses, the debate on the competence of the child as a witness has shifted to a judgement on the reliability of the child's testimony in the context of the development of psycho-cognitive science. Methodology: The physiological and psychological characteristics of child witnesses determine their deficiencies in the encoding, storage and extraction of memory information, and therefore the reliability of child testimonies is a key and difficult issue. For this reason, this paper uses documentary analysis to further analyse child witness testimony as the focus of the study. Main Findings: A psychological analysis of the multiple factors that affect the reliability of children's testimony. Two conclusions are drawn: 1. Children are in principle competent to testify. The development of children's testimonial competence leads to the conclusion that even very young children can remember events that happened long ago, especially if they already have prior knowledge about them. 2. Practical guidance for improving the truthfulness of the content of child witness statements improves the reliability of child witness testimony. Children can be influenced in a variety of ways to recount detailed and complete accounts of events that did not occur, such that professionals are unable to distinguish between false and truthful accounts. Perhaps the next step is to improve "questioning techniques". Novelty of the study: Correct and reliable witness testimony is key to the investigation and trial process. The importance of child witness testimony has become increasingly apparent in recent years as the number of cases involving children has increased. This issue has previously only been the focus of jurists, and this study analyses it from a psychological perspective, laying the groundwork for subsequent research in law and psychology.

Critique of a measure of interrogative suggestibility for children: The Bonn test of statement suggestibility

Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and synthesis

Evaluating autobiographical skills and their relationship with suggestibility in children: development and validation of the Children Recalling Autobiographical Memory

The relationship of compliance with immediate and delayed suggestibility and types of resistant behavioral responses in children aged 10–15 years

Psychological analysis of child witness testimony

Interrogative suggestibility: The role of source monitoring, compliance, and memory in the context of minimally leading questions

The roles of interviewing conditions and individual differences in memory and suggestibility: An online interview study

Children's false memory and true disclosure in the face of repeated questions

Idiosyncratic effects of interviewer behavior on the accuracy of children's responses

The Diagnostic Value of Children's Responses to Cross-Examination Questioning

Bilingualism measures in children: A critical review of content overlap, development, and pragmatic quality

What the stories children tell can tell about their memory: Narrative skill and young children's suggestibility.

German Parents and Educators of Two to Four-Year-Old Children as Informants for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Why some children accept under-informative utterances

Evidence to support test interpretation: Evaluating the content validity of a new item set for the Transition Pragmatics Interview

A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay

Development and validation of a test battery to assess subtle neurodevelopmental differences in children

Measurement tools for behaviours that challenge and behavioural function in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability

What I see, what you say: How cross‐method variation sharpens characterization of irritability in early childhood

How can applicants' reactions to scholastic aptitude tests be improved? A closer look at specific and general tests