Abstract:Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has approved the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). A version of the ICD-11 for Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders for use in clinical settings, called the Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements (CDDR), has also been developed. The CDDR includes behavioural indicators (BIs) for assessing the severity of disorders of intellectual development (DID) as part of the section on neurodevelopmental disorders. Reliable and valid diagnostic assessment measures are needed to improve identification and treatment of individuals with DID. Although appropriately normed, standardised intellectual and adaptive behaviour assessments are considered the optimal assessment approach in this area, they are unavailable in many parts of the world. This field study tested the BIs internationally to assess the inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and clinical utility of the BIs for the assessment of DID. Methods: This international study recruited a total of 206 children and adolescents (5-18 years old) with a suspected or established diagnosis of DID from four sites across three countries [Sri-Lanka (n = 57), Italy (n = 60) and two sites in India (n = 89)]. Two clinicians assessed each participant using the BIs with one conducting the clinical interview and the other observing. Diagnostic formulations using the BIs and clinical utility ratings were collected and entered independently after each assessment. At a follow-up appointment, standardised measures (Leiter-3, Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales-II) were used to assess intellectual and adaptive abilities. Results: The BIs had excellent inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlations ranging from 0.91 to 0.97) and good to excellent concurrent validity (intra-class correlations ranging from 0.66 to 0.82) across sites. Compared to standardised measures, the BIs had more diagnostic overlap between intellectual and adaptive functioning. The BIs were rated as quick and easy to use and applicable across severities; clear and understandable with adequate to too much level of detail and specificity to describe DID; and useful for treatment selection, prognosis assessments, communication with other health care professionals, and education efforts. Conclusion: The inclusion of newly developed BIs within the CDDR for ICD-11 Neurodevelopmental Disorders must be supported by information on their reliability, validity, and clinical utility prior to their widespread adoption for international use. BIs were found to have excellent inter-rater reliability, good to excellent concurrent validity, and good clinical utility. This supports use of the BIs within the ICD-11 CDDR to assist with the accurate identification of individuals with DID, particularly in settings where specialised services are unavailable.

Measurement tools for behaviours that challenge and behavioural function in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability

Outcome Measures in intellectual disability: A Review and narrative synthesis of validated instruments

Characterising Insistence on Sameness and Circumscribed Interests: A Qualitative Study of Parent Perspectives

Psychometric properties of two ADHD rating scales used in children with ADHD and intellectual disability

Development and Initial Psychometrics of a Generic Treatment Integrity Measure Designed to Assess Practice Elements Targeting Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes in Early Childhood Settings

Examining the measurement precision of behavior problems among a sample of primarily rural youth on juvenile probation and their parents

An Evaluation of the Overall Utility of Measures of Functioning Suitable for School-Aged Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review

An international field study of the ICD-11 behavioural indicators for disorders of intellectual development

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of tools for measuring depression in youths with intellectual disability

The Behavior Problem Inventory‐Short Form: Psychometric Properties in a Spanish Sample of Intellectual Disabilities

Assessment of adaptive behavior in people with intellectual disabilities: Design and development of a new test battery

Validation of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in intellectual disability

Reliability and Validity of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Assessment (CABA): A Brief Structured Scale

Measurement properties of tools measuring mental health knowledge: a systematic review

Applicability and Psychometric Properties of General Mental Health Assessment Tools in Autistic People: A Systematic Review

Measuring parent strategy use in early intervention: Reliability and validity of the Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Fidelity Rating Scale across strategy types

Implementation of the International Classification of Diseases 11th revision behavioural indicators for disorders of intellectual development with co-occurring autism spectrum disorder

What types of objective measures have been used to assess core ADHD symptoms in children and young people in naturalistic settings? A scoping review

A systematic review of the behaviours associated with depression in people with severe-profound intellectual disability

Identifying studies examining the validity of instruments for use as outcome measures in child and adolescent forensic mental health services: a systematic review

Novel approaches to measuring cognition in individuals with severe to profound functional impairment: A pilot study in SCN2A-related disorder