Abstract:What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict.

Portuguese Policy in Sri Lanka as a Reflection of the Emergence of 16th Century International Law

PORTUGUESE IMPERIAL BUILDING IN THE KOTTE KINGDOM OF SRI LANKA AS A REFLECTION OF 16TH CENTURY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Of International Law, Semi-colonial Thailand, and Imperial Ghosts

Sri Lanka, its Laws and its Women: Feminist Jurisprudence Views Law as a Subversive Site for Women

Non Align Foreign Policy Towards Great Powers And Regional Power- Case Study Sri Lanka

International Law in Portuguese

Language Politics in Sri Lanka: Linguistic Purism, Cultural Pluralism and Identity

Mixing Writs with Rights: The Implications for Public Law in Sri Lanka

Intertwined Itineraries: Debt, Decolonization, and International Law in Post-World War II South Asia

Portuguese-speaking Africa and the Lusophone legal system: All in the family?

Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900

The International Legal Framework Governing Chinese Investments in Sri Lanka; An Impetus for Increased Commercial Diplomacy

Restrained freedom? Widows, blended families and inheritance in eighteenth-century urban Sri Lanka

Law Making Treaties: The Implication of International Law towards Indonesia’s Legislations

What Is International Law

Law of ‘Isolation’ and its legitimacy of practice in Sri Lanka: a Judicial Review

The Gulf between the Rule of Law and Money Laundering in Sri Lanka

Post-war reforms in Sri Lanka: need to tie minority demands to a rule of law discourse

Towards a History of the Decolonization of International Law. An Introduction to the Special Issue

International Law and Contemporary world Politics

Back to Square One: Attempted Legal Amendments and Abortion Practices in Sri Lanka