Abstract:What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict.

PORTUGUESE IMPERIAL BUILDING IN THE KOTTE KINGDOM OF SRI LANKA AS A REFLECTION OF 16TH CENTURY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Portuguese Policy in Sri Lanka as a Reflection of the Emergence of 16th Century International Law

Of International Law, Semi-colonial Thailand, and Imperial Ghosts

Features of Portuguese colonial architecture in South Asia in the period from XVI to XVIII centuries.

Sri Lanka, its Laws and its Women: Feminist Jurisprudence Views Law as a Subversive Site for Women

Intertwined Itineraries: Debt, Decolonization, and International Law in Post-World War II South Asia

International Law in Portuguese

International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order

Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900

Politics in the Origins: The Making of Corporate Law in Nineteenth-Century Brazil

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

The Final Splendour Of An Aged Empire: Chinese Thought On International Law In The Early Twentieth Century

Non Align Foreign Policy Towards Great Powers And Regional Power- Case Study Sri Lanka

What Is International Law

Mixing Writs with Rights: The Implications for Public Law in Sri Lanka

Perceiving law without colonialism: Revisiting courts and constitutionalism in South Asia

Law Making Treaties: The Implication of International Law towards Indonesia’s Legislations

The International Legal Framework Governing Chinese Investments in Sri Lanka; An Impetus for Increased Commercial Diplomacy

Portuguese-speaking Africa and the Lusophone legal system: All in the family?

Language Politics in Sri Lanka: Linguistic Purism, Cultural Pluralism and Identity

International Law and Contemporary world Politics