Abstract:What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict.

Towards a History of the Decolonization of International Law. An Introduction to the Special Issue

Decolonizing the Corpus: A Queer Decolonial Re-examination of Gender in International Law's Origins

The impact of colonialism on policy and knowledge production in International Relations

Rethinking International Law: A TWAIL Retrospective

Organizing Internationally: Georges Abi-Saab, the Congo Crisis and the Decolonization of the United Nations

Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900

History and philosophy of geography I: Decolonising the discipline, diversifying archives and historicising radicalism

What Is International Law

International Law and Contemporary world Politics

Decolonisation, Global Data Law, and Indigenous Data Sovereignty

Beyond the epistemological debates about the time in history, the relativity of historical time: decolonial theory facing the Western historiographical hegemony

What research evidence can support the decolonisation of global health? Making space for deeper scholarship in global health journals

Decolonization in sexual and reproductive health research methods: a scoping review

Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in mid-20th-century India

What is IHL history now?

The Concept of Imperialism in the Contemporary International Law Discourse

The Dynamics of Self-determination in the Context of Statehood and Sovereignty in International Law

Worlding war as a primary institution of international society

History Education for Transitional Justice? Challenges, Limitations and Possibilities for Settler Colonial Australia

The Final Splendour Of An Aged Empire: Chinese Thought On International Law In The Early Twentieth Century

What Do Global Health Practitioners Think about Decolonizing Global Health?