Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

History and philosophy of geography I: Decolonising the discipline, diversifying archives and historicising radicalism

Decolonising pedagogies in undergraduate geography: student perspectives on a Decolonial Movements module

Urban geography I

For critical geo‐histories of population. Engaging geographically with Massimo Livi Bacci's works

Will the real people's geography please stand up? Community, public, and participatory geographies in conversation

Geography and Environment: New Conversations, New Communities

Rural geography I

From the drought to the mud: rediscovering geopoetics and cultural hybridity from the Global South

Geographies of media and communication I

Perspectives on Internationalism in Geography

Geographies of science and technology II: In the critical zone

Let Geography Die: The Rise, Fall, and “Unfinished Business” of Geography at Harvard

Historical Geography in Brazil: Examining Backgrounds and New Perspectives

An indigenous geographic position on producing data in colonial conditions

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Restructuring physical geography

Parrhesia and female leadership: radical women in Brazilian geography against dictatorship and academic conservatism

Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization

Exploring the role of study abroad in decolonising geography curricula

Integrating Indigenous Knowledge in South African Geography Education Curricula for Social Justice and Decolonization

Making Space in Geographical Analysis