Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

Geographies of science and technology II: In the critical zone

Critical Geography's nature problem and the Lefebvrian ecological dialectic

Earth Critical Zone: A Comprehensive Exploration of the Earth's Surface Processes

Beyond Green: Human–environment geographies for the ‘new’ century

Revitalizing science and technology studies: A Marxian critique of more-than-human geographies

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Science fiction, reconfigured social theory and the Anthropocene Age: exploring and thinking about planetary futures through fictional imaginaries

Anthropology and the Anthropocene: Criticisms, Experiments, and Collaborations

Geographies of media and communication I

History and philosophy of geography I: Decolonising the discipline, diversifying archives and historicising radicalism

A political ecology of data

Urban geography I

Geographic information science II

Geographic information science II: Mesogeography

Expanding the Spatial Reach and Human Impacts of Critical Zone Science

Geographic information science III

Toward an Upgrade of Gaia-politics: A View from the East Asian Critical Zone

A Post-Capitalocentric Critique of Digital Technology and Environmental Harm: New Directions at the Intersection of Digital and Green Criminology

Science Fiction in the Anthropocene

On teaching geomorphology: making it more scientific via the Critical Zone concept

The Ecology of Fringe Science and its Bearing on Policy