Abstract:Solid-state lithium (Li) metal batteries are widely used due to their excellent safety, superior energy density, and low cost. Nevertheless, the practical application of solid-state Li batteries is hindered by the inferior ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and poor interface contact between the electrode and electrolyte. Herein, a flexible, hybrid ceramic-based electrolyte was fabricated by a solution-casting method using poly(vinylidene fluoride), Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 powders, and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide. To realize high ionic conductivity and a stable self-viscous electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact simultaneously, a mixed solution of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, and fluoroethylene carbonate was introduced by the solution-infiltration method. The self-viscous Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 ceramic-based electrolyte exhibits superior ionic conductivity (2.4 × 10–4 S cm–1 at 25 °C), a high ionic transference number (0.42), wide voltage window (4.8 V vs Li/Li+), excellent thermal stabilities, and the ability to impede Li dendrite growth. In particular, the stable contact, low interfacial resistance, and fast ion-transport channels between the electrodes and solid electrolytes can be achieved by the self-viscous interfacial layer. The solid-state LiFePO4|Li battery assembled with the solid self-viscous electrolyte demonstrates a satisfactory initial discharge capacity of 138.0 mAh g–1 and capacity retention of 96.5% after 200 cycles at 0.5 C and under 25 °C. The self-viscous modification strategy of the solid electrolyte affords promising options for implementing the intimate electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact in high-energy-density solid-state batteries.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01202.Figure S1: XRD patterns and SEM image of LATP ceramic powders. Figure S2: Temperature dependence of ionic conductivities for LATP pellets. Figure S3: Flexible and winding performances of self-viscous PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S4: Surface morphology of PL and PLL-LEF electrolytes. Figure S5: Adhesiveness exhibitions of PLL-LE composite electrolyte. Figure S6: EIS profiles of 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI and 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI-10FEC electrolytes. Figure S7: EIS profiles of stainless steel|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S8: Thermogravimetry curve of PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S9: Flammability test of routine Celgard separator. Figure S10: EIS profiles of Li|PLL|Li cell for different aging times. Figure S11: Optical photographs of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S12: Ti 2p XPS of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S13: EIS profiles of Li symmetric cell with different electrolytes after cycling. Figure S14: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.2 mA·cm–2. Figure S15: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.5 mA·cm–2. Figure S16: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S17: High multiple SEM images of Li surfaces obtained from Li symmetrical cells. Figure S18: SEM image of pristine Li surface. Figure S19: EIS results of LiFePO4|PLL|Li, LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li and LiFePO4|PLL-LEF|Li batteries. Figure S20: Typical charge–discharge voltage profiles of LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li cell at 0.5 C. Figure S21: Electrochemical properties of Al2O3@LiNi0.5Co0.3Mn0.3O2|PLL-LEF|Li cell (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Hybrid Ceramic-Gel Polymer Electrolyte with a 3D Cross-Linked Polymer Network for Lithium–Oxygen Batteries

In Situ Thermal Polymerization of a Succinonitrile-Based Gel Polymer Electrolyte for Lithium-Oxygen Batteries.

Ceramic/Polymer Hybrid Electrolyte with Enhanced Interfacial Contact for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Stabilizing Ceramic-Based Electrolyte Interfaces with Self-Viscous Modification Strategy for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Self-Sacrificed Interface-Based on the Flexible Composite Electrolyte for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries.

Unraveling the Synergistic Coupling Mechanism of Li + Transport in an “Ionogel‐in‐Ceramic” Hybrid Solid Electrolyte for Rechargeable Lithium Metal Battery

Flame Retardant and Stable Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3-Supported Ionic Liquid Gel Polymer Electrolytes for High Safety Rechargeable Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

In Situ Gelation of a 1,3-Dioxolane Dual-Permeable Porous Tandem Framework with Excellent Interfacial Stability to Power Long-Cycling Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Boosting lithium-ion transport capability of LAGP/PPO composite solid electrolyte via component regulation from ‘Ceramics-in-Polymer’ to ‘Polymer-in-Ceramics'

Rationally Designed in-Situ Gelled Polymer-Ceramic Hybrid Electrolyte Enables Superior Performance and Stability in Quasi-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Inorganic/polymer Hybrid Layer Stabilizing Anode/electrolyte Interfaces in Solid-State Li Metal Batteries

In Situ Construction of Ether-Based Composite Electrolyte with Stable Electrode Interphase for High-Performance Solid State Lithium Metal Battery

Garnet/polymer solid electrolytes for high-performance solid-state lithium metal batteries: The role of amorphous Li2O2

High performance of solid electrolyte endowed by SiO 2 cross-linking agent towards lithium metal battery

Rechargeable Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries with Vertically Aligned Ceramic Nanoparticle/polymer Composite Electrolyte

Garnet Electrolyte‐Based Integrated Architecture for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium‐Oxygen Batteries

An Advanced Gel Polymer Electrolyte for Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Immobilizing Ceramic Electrolyte Particles into a Gel Matrix Formed In Situ for Stable Li-Metal Batteries

PEO/garnet Composite Electrolytes for Solid-State Lithium Batteries: from “Ceramic-in-polymer” to “Polymer-in-ceramic”

Graphene Oxide Aerogel Foam Constructed All-Solid Electrolyte Membranes for Lithium Batteries.

Tuning composite solid-state electrolyte interface to improve the electrochemical performance of lithium-oxygen battery