Abstract:Solid-state lithium (Li) metal batteries are widely used due to their excellent safety, superior energy density, and low cost. Nevertheless, the practical application of solid-state Li batteries is hindered by the inferior ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte and poor interface contact between the electrode and electrolyte. Herein, a flexible, hybrid ceramic-based electrolyte was fabricated by a solution-casting method using poly(vinylidene fluoride), Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 powders, and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide. To realize high ionic conductivity and a stable self-viscous electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact simultaneously, a mixed solution of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide, and fluoroethylene carbonate was introduced by the solution-infiltration method. The self-viscous Li1.4Al0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 ceramic-based electrolyte exhibits superior ionic conductivity (2.4 × 10–4 S cm–1 at 25 °C), a high ionic transference number (0.42), wide voltage window (4.8 V vs Li/Li+), excellent thermal stabilities, and the ability to impede Li dendrite growth. In particular, the stable contact, low interfacial resistance, and fast ion-transport channels between the electrodes and solid electrolytes can be achieved by the self-viscous interfacial layer. The solid-state LiFePO4|Li battery assembled with the solid self-viscous electrolyte demonstrates a satisfactory initial discharge capacity of 138.0 mAh g–1 and capacity retention of 96.5% after 200 cycles at 0.5 C and under 25 °C. The self-viscous modification strategy of the solid electrolyte affords promising options for implementing the intimate electrode/electrolyte interfacial contact in high-energy-density solid-state batteries.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01202.Figure S1: XRD patterns and SEM image of LATP ceramic powders. Figure S2: Temperature dependence of ionic conductivities for LATP pellets. Figure S3: Flexible and winding performances of self-viscous PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S4: Surface morphology of PL and PLL-LEF electrolytes. Figure S5: Adhesiveness exhibitions of PLL-LE composite electrolyte. Figure S6: EIS profiles of 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI and 10LiTFSI-40EMITFSI-10FEC electrolytes. Figure S7: EIS profiles of stainless steel|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S8: Thermogravimetry curve of PLL-LEF electrolyte. Figure S9: Flammability test of routine Celgard separator. Figure S10: EIS profiles of Li|PLL|Li cell for different aging times. Figure S11: Optical photographs of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S12: Ti 2p XPS of the PLL electrolyte. Figure S13: EIS profiles of Li symmetric cell with different electrolytes after cycling. Figure S14: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.2 mA·cm–2. Figure S15: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells at 0.5 mA·cm–2. Figure S16: Constant current cycling curves of Li|PLL-LEF|Li cells. Figure S17: High multiple SEM images of Li surfaces obtained from Li symmetrical cells. Figure S18: SEM image of pristine Li surface. Figure S19: EIS results of LiFePO4|PLL|Li, LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li and LiFePO4|PLL-LEF|Li batteries. Figure S20: Typical charge–discharge voltage profiles of LiFePO4|PLL-LE|Li cell at 0.5 C. Figure S21: Electrochemical properties of Al2O3@LiNi0.5Co0.3Mn0.3O2|PLL-LEF|Li cell (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Immobilizing Ceramic Electrolyte Particles into a Gel Matrix Formed In Situ for Stable Li-Metal Batteries

Rationally Designed in-Situ Gelled Polymer-Ceramic Hybrid Electrolyte Enables Superior Performance and Stability in Quasi-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Multiscale Structural Gel Polymer Electrolytes with Fast Li+ Transport for Long‐Life Li Metal Batteries

In Situ Polymerization Inhibiting Electron Localization in Hybrid Electrolyte for Room‐Temperature Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

Inorganic Filler Enhanced Formation of Stable Inorganic‐Rich Solid Electrolyte Interphase for High Performance Lithium Metal Batteries

Synergistically enabling the interface stability of lithium metal batteries with soft ionic gel and garnet-type Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 ceramic filler

Metal–Organic Framework-Supported Poly(ethylene oxide) Composite Gel Polymer Electrolytes for High-Performance Lithium/Sodium Metal Batteries

Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12-Based Solid-State Lithium Batteries Achieved by In Situ Thermally Polymerized Gel Polymer Electrolyte

Molecule-Level Multiscale Design of Nonflammable Gel Polymer Electrolyte to Build Stable SEI/CEI for Lithium Metal Battery

In Situ Construction of Ether-Based Composite Electrolyte with Stable Electrode Interphase for High-Performance Solid State Lithium Metal Battery

An in Situ-Formed LiI Interface Layer for Garnet-Based Lithium Metal Batteries

In Situ Formed Gel Polymer Electrolytes Enable Stable Solid Electrolyte Interface for High-Performance Lithium Metal Batteries

Stable Li–Metal Batteries Enabled by in Situ Gelation of an Electrolyte and In-Built Fluorinated Solid Electrolyte Interface

An Ionic Liquid‐Based Gel Electrolyte: Formation Mechanism and Feasibility for Lithium Metal Batteries

Flame Retardant and Stable Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3-Supported Ionic Liquid Gel Polymer Electrolytes for High Safety Rechargeable Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Unraveling the Synergistic Coupling Mechanism of Li + Transport in an “Ionogel‐in‐Ceramic” Hybrid Solid Electrolyte for Rechargeable Lithium Metal Battery

In situ synthesis of gel polymer electrolyte for lithium-metal anodes with a sulfide-enhanced interface via thiol–ene click chemistry

Solid-state nanocomposite ionogel electrolyte with in-situ formed ionic channels for uniform ion-flux and suppressing dendrite formation in lithium metal batteries

Molecular engineering of a gel polymer electrolyte via in-situ polymerization for high performance lithium metal batteries

Stabilizing Ceramic-Based Electrolyte Interfaces with Self-Viscous Modification Strategy for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Rational Design of Hierarchical “Ceramic‐in‐Polymer” and “Polymer‐in‐Ceramic” Electrolytes for Dendrite‐Free Solid‐State Batteries