Abstract:Individualized treatment rules can improve health outcomes by recognizing that patients may respond differently to treatment and assigning therapy with the most desirable predicted outcome for each individual. Flexible and efficient prediction models are desired as a basis for such individualized treatment rules to handle potentially complex interactions between patient factors and treatment. Modern Bayesian semiparametric and nonparametric regression models provide an attractive avenue in this regard as these allow natural posterior uncertainty quantification of patient specific treatment decisions as well as the population wide value of the prediction-based individualized treatment rule. In addition, via the use of such models, inference is also available for the value of the optimal individualized treatment rules. We propose such an approach and implement it using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees as this model has been shown to perform well in fitting nonparametric regression functions to continuous and binary responses, even with many covariates. It is also computationally efficient for use in practice. With Bayesian Additive Regression Trees, we investigate a treatment strategy which utilizes individualized predictions of patient outcomes from Bayesian Additive Regression Trees models. Posterior distributions of patient outcomes under each treatment are used to assign the treatment that maximizes the expected posterior utility. We also describe how to approximate such a treatment policy with a clinically interpretable individualized treatment rule, and quantify its expected outcome. The proposed method performs very well in extensive simulation studies in comparison with several existing methods. We illustrate the usage of the proposed method to identify an individualized choice of conditioning regimen for patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation and quantify the value of this method of choice in relation to the optimal individualized treatment rule as well as non-individualized treatment strategies.

Modelling hetegeneous treatment effects by quantitle local polynomial decision tree and forest

Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

Hybrid Censored Quantile Regression Forest to Assess the Heterogeneous Effects

Heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for observational data using model-based forests

Wasserstein Random Forests and Applications in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Targeting relative risk heterogeneity with causal forests

Debiased causal tree: Heterogeneous treatment effects estimation with unmeasured confounding

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Panel Data

Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for nonlinear mixed effects models based on the generalized asymmetric Laplace distribution

Difference-in-differences meets tree-based methods: heterogeneous treatment effects estimation with unmeasured confounding

Difference-in-Differences Meets Tree-based Methods: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation with Unmeasured Confounding.

Enhanced inference for distributions and quantiles of individual treatment effects in various experiments

Distilling interpretable causal trees from causal forests

Causal Rule Forest: Toward Interpretable and Precise Treatment Effect Estimation

Treatment Effect Quantiles in Stratified Randomized Experiments and Matched Observational Studies

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Quantile Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects

Shrinkage Bayesian Causal Forests for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation

Random forests of interaction trees for estimating individualized treatment effects in randomized trials

Enabling Decision-Making with the Modified Causal Forest: Policy Trees for Treatment Assignment

Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees