Abstract:Treatment effect plays an important role on decision making in many fields, such as social marketing, healthcare, and public policy. The key challenge on estimating treatment effect in the wild observational studies is to handle confounding bias induced by imbalance of the confounder distributions between treated and control units. Traditional methods remove confounding bias by re-weighting units with supposedly accurate propensity score estimation under the unconfoundedness assumption. Controlling high-dimensional variables may make the unconfoundedness assumption more plausible, but poses new challenge on accurate propensity score estimation. One strand of recent literature seeks to directly optimize weights to balance confounder distributions, bypassing propensity score estimation. But existing balancing methods fail to do selection and differentiation among the pool of a large number of potential confounders, leading to possible underperformance in many high-dimensional settings. In this article, we propose a data-driven Differentiated Confounder Balancing (DCB) algorithm to jointly select confounders, differentiate weights of confounders and balance confounder distributions for treatment effect estimation in the wild high-dimensional settings. Besides, under some settings with heavy confounding bias, in order to further reduce the bias and variance of estimated treatment effect, we propose a Regression Adjusted Differentiated Confounder Balancing (RA-DCB) algorithm based on our DCB algorithm by incorporating outcome regression adjustment. The synergistic learning algorithms we proposed are more capable of reducing the confounding bias in many observational studies. To validate the effectiveness of our DCB and RA-DCB algorithms, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that our algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art methods. By incorporating regression adjustment, our RA-DCB algorithm achieves more precise estimation on treatment effect than DCB algorithm, especially under the settings with heavy confounding bias. Moreover, we show that the top features ranked by our algorithm generate accurate prediction of online advertising effect.

Hybrid Censored Quantile Regression Forest to Assess the Heterogeneous Effects

From regression rank scores to robust inference for censored quantile regression

Global Censored Quantile Random Forest

Inference for High-Dimensional Censored Quantile Regression

Censored Quantile Regression Forests

Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests

Modelling hetegeneous treatment effects by quantitle local polynomial decision tree and forest

Heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for observational data using model-based forests

Homogeneity Pursuit in the Functional-Coefficient Quantile Regression Model for Panel Data with Censored Data

Wasserstein Random Forests and Applications in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Targeting relative risk heterogeneity with causal forests

Weighted Composite Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Mixed Effects Models with Application to AIDS Studies

Stable Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.

Quantile Treatment Effect Estimation with Dimension Reduction

Penalized regression across multiple quantiles under random censoring

Assessing the properties of patient-specific treatment effect estimates from causal forest algorithms under essential heterogeneity

Treatment Effect Estimation Via Differentiated Confounder Balancing and Regression

Treatment Effect Quantiles in Stratified Randomized Experiments and Matched Observational Studies

A Nonparametric Test Of Heterogeneity In Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects

Causal Rule Forest: Toward Interpretable and Precise Treatment Effect Estimation

Quantile-adaptive variable screening in ultra-high dimensional varying coefficient models