Abstract:Individuals differ not only in their background characteristics but also in how they respond to a particular treatment, intervention, or stimulation. In particular, treatment effects may vary systematically by the propensity for treatment. In this paper, we discuss a practical approach to studying heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of the treatment propensity, under the same assumption commonly underlying regression analysis: ignorability. We describe one parametric method and two nonparametric methods for estimating interactions between treatment and the propensity for treatment. For the first method, we begin by estimating propensity scores for the probability of treatment given a set of observed covariates for each unit and construct balanced propensity score strata; we then estimate propensity score stratum-specific average treatment effects and evaluate a trend across them. For the second method, we match control units to treated units based on the propensity score and transform the data into treatment-control comparisons at the most elementary level at which such comparisons can be constructed; we then estimate treatment effects as a function of the propensity score by fitting a nonparametric model as a smoothing device. For the third method, we first estimate nonparametric regressions of the outcome variable as a function of the propensity score separately for treated units and for control units and then take the difference between the two nonparametric regressions. We illustrate the application of these methods with an empirical example of the effects of college attendance on women’s fertility.

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Quantile Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects

Wage Differentials between Public and Non-public Sector Based on Quantile Regression

Oracle Efficient Estimation of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects

Threshold Regression in Heterogeneous Panel Data with Interactive Fixed Effects

Extreme Quantile Treatment Effects under Endogeneity: Evaluating Policy Effects for the Most Vulnerable Individuals

Quantile‐Based Test for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Functional-Coefficient Quantile Regression for Panel Data with Latent Group Structure

Evaluating the Impact of Regulatory Policies on Social Welfare in Difference-in-Difference Settings

A quantile-based nonadditive fixed effects model

Quantile regression for general spatial panel data models with fixed effects

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data

Set Identification of Panel Data Models with Interactive Effects Via Quantile Restrictions

TWO-STEP ESTIMATION OF QUANTILE PANEL DATA MODELS WITH INTERACTIVE FIXED EFFECTS

Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects

Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data Using Hausman–Taylor Instrumental Variables

Quantile-regression-based clustering for panel data

A Nonparametric Test Of Heterogeneity In Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects

Nonparametric Quantile Regression for Homogeneity Pursuit in Panel Data Models

Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Extreme Conditional Quantiles for Panel Data Model with Individual Effects

Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies with Heterogeneous Partial Interference