Abstract:While a randomized control trial is considered the gold standard for estimating causal treatment effects, there are many research settings in which randomization is infeasible or unethical. In such cases, researchers rely on analytical methods for observational data to explore causal relationships. Difference-in-differences (DID) is one such method that, most commonly, estimates a difference in some mean outcome in a group before and after the implementation of an intervention or policy and compares this with a control group followed over the same time (i.e., a group that did not implement the intervention or policy). Although DID modeling approaches have been gaining popularity in public health research, the majority of these approaches and their extensions are developed and shared within the economics literature. While extensions of DID modeling approaches may be straightforward to apply to observational data in any field, the complexities and assumptions involved in newer approaches are often misunderstood. In this paper, we focus on recent extensions of the DID method and their relationships to linear models in the setting of staggered treatment adoption over multiple years. We detail the identification and estimation of the average treatment effect among the treated using potential outcomes notation, highlighting the assumptions necessary to produce valid estimates. These concepts are described within the context of Medicaid expansion and retention in care among people living with HIV (PWH) in the United States. While each DID approach is potentially valid, understanding their different assumptions and choosing an appropriate method can have important implications for policy-makers, funders, and public health as a whole.

Evaluating the Impact of Regulatory Policies on Social Welfare in Difference-in-Difference Settings

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Quantile Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects

Identification and Inference for Welfare Gains without Unconfoundedness

Identifying the Distribution of Welfare from Discrete Choice

Applying Regression Discontinuity Design to Social Policy: An Evaluation of the Welfare-to-Work Program in South Korea

An Optimal Transport Approach to Estimating Causal Effects via Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences

Partial Identification of Distributional Treatment Effects in Panel Data Using Copula Equality Assumptions

Welfare Analysis via Marginal Treatment Effects

Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation

The chained difference-in-differences

Identifying and estimating effects of sustained interventions under parallel trends assumptions

The Marginal Labor Supply Disincentives of Welfare: Evidence from Administrative Barriers to Participation

Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Demand and Welfare Analysis in Discrete Choice Models with Social Interactions

Understanding Difference-in-differences methods to evaluate policy effects with staggered adoption: an application to Medicaid and HIV

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers

Sensitivity Analysis in Unconditional Quantile Effects

A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning

Causal Duration Analysis with Diff-in-Diff

IDENTIFICATION AND INFERENCE IN A QUANTILE REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGN UNDER RANK SIMILARITY WITH COVARIATES

Difference-in-Differences Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effect on the Treated