Abstract:This paper discusses methodological problems of standard errors and treatment effects. First, heteroskedasticity- and cluster-robust estimates are considered as well as problems with Bernoulli distributed regressors, outliers and partially identified parameters. Second, procedures to determine treatment effects are analyzed. Four principles are in the focus: difference-in-differences estimators, matching procedures, treatment effects in quantile regression analysis and regression discontinuity approaches. These methods are applied to Cobb-Douglas functions using IAB establishment panel data.Different heteroskedasticity-consistent procedures lead to similar results of standard errors. Cluster-robust estimates show evident deviates. Dummies with a mean near 0.5 have a smaller variance of the coefficient estimates than others. Not all outliers have a strong influence on significance. New methods to handle the problem of partially identified parameters lead to more efficient estimates.The four discussed treatment procedures are applied to the question whether company-level pacts affect the output. In contrast to unconditional difference-in-differences and to estimates without matching the company-level effect is positive but insignificant if conditional difference-in-differences, nearest-neighbor or Mahalanobis metric matching is applied. The latter result has to be specified under quantile treatment effects analysis. The higher the quantile the higher is the positive company-level pact effect and there is a tendency from insignificant to significant effects. A sharp regression discontinuity analysis shows a structural break at a probability of 0.5 that a company-level pact exists. No specific effect of the Great Recession can be detected. Fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates reveal that the company-level pact effect is significantly lower in East than in West Germany.

Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Two-Way Fixed Effects, the Two-Way Mundlak Regression, and Difference-in-Differences Estimators

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers

Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects

Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data

Difference-in-Differences for Policy Evaluation

Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics—methods and applications

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Quantile Regression with Interactive Fixed Effects

Design-Robust Two-Way-Fixed-Effects Regression For Panel Data

Linear panel regressions with two-way unobserved heterogeneity

Estimation of treatment effects under endogeneous heteroskedasticity

Estimating Heterogeneous Effects: Applications to Labor Economics

Doubly Robust Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators with High-Dimensional Data

Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments

Heterogeneous treatment effects analysis for social scientists: A review

The chained difference-in-differences

When Can We Use Two-Way Fixed-Effects (TWFE): A Comparison of TWFE and Novel Dynamic Difference-in-Differences Estimators

How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates?