Abstract:Individuals differ not only in their background characteristics but also in how they respond to a particular treatment, intervention, or stimulation. In particular, treatment effects may vary systematically by the propensity for treatment. In this paper, we discuss a practical approach to studying heterogeneous treatment effects as a function of the treatment propensity, under the same assumption commonly underlying regression analysis: ignorability. We describe one parametric method and two nonparametric methods for estimating interactions between treatment and the propensity for treatment. For the first method, we begin by estimating propensity scores for the probability of treatment given a set of observed covariates for each unit and construct balanced propensity score strata; we then estimate propensity score stratum-specific average treatment effects and evaluate a trend across them. For the second method, we match control units to treated units based on the propensity score and transform the data into treatment-control comparisons at the most elementary level at which such comparisons can be constructed; we then estimate treatment effects as a function of the propensity score by fitting a nonparametric model as a smoothing device. For the third method, we first estimate nonparametric regressions of the outcome variable as a function of the propensity score separately for treated units and for control units and then take the difference between the two nonparametric regressions. We illustrate the application of these methods with an empirical example of the effects of college attendance on women’s fertility.

Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers

The chained difference-in-differences

Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences

Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation

Simple Approaches to Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences with Panel Data

Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Difference-in-Differences Estimator of Quantile Treatment Effect on the Treated

Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Estimators With Variation in Treatment Timing

An Effective Treatment Approach to Difference-in-Differences with General Treatment Patterns

Design-Robust Two-Way-Fixed-Effects Regression For Panel Data

A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning

Difference-in-Differences for Policy Evaluation

Doubly Robust Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators with High-Dimensional Data

Causal Duration Analysis with Diff-in-Diff

Treatment Effects in Interactive Fixed Effects Models with a Small Number of Time Periods

Fused Extended Two-Way Fixed Effects for Difference-in-Differences With Staggered Adoptions

Difference-in-Differences Meets Tree-based Methods: Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Estimation with Unmeasured Confounding.

An Optimal Transport Approach to Estimating Causal Effects via Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data