The Difference of Thermal Energy Transmitted to the Earth by Radiation from Different Parts of the Solar Surface
J. ERICSSON
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/012517b0
IF: 64.8
1875-10-01
Nature
Abstract:PÈRE SECCHI, in the second edition of “Le Soleil,” published at Paris 1875, again calls attention to the result of his early investigations of the force of radiation emanating from different regions of the sun's surface, reiterating without modification his former opinions regarding the absorption of the radiant heat by the solar atmosphere, It will be well to bear in mind that the plan adopted by the Italian physicist in his original researches, on which his present opinion is based, was that of projecting the sun's image on a screen, and then, by means of thermopiles, measuring the temperature at different points. The serious defects inseparable from this method of measuring the intensity of the radiant heat I need not point out, nor will it be necessary to urge that a correct determination of the energy transmitted calls for direct observation of the temperature produced by the rays projected towards the earth. Accordingly, on taking up that branch of my investigations of radiant heat which relates to the difference of intensity transmitted from different parts of the sun's surface, I adopted the method of direct observation. The progress was slow at the beginning, owing to the necessity of constructing an astronomical apparatus of unusual dimensions, but having devised means which rendered the employment of any desirable focal length practicable, the work has progressed rapidly. An instrument of 17.7 metres (58 feet) focal length, erected to conduct preliminary experiments, has proved so satisfactory that the construction of one of 30 metres focal length, which I supposed to be necessary, has been dispensed with. Considering that the apparent diameter of the sun at a distance of 17.7 metres from the observer's eye is 162.4 millimetres even when the earth is in aphelion, the efficacy of the instrument employed might have been anticipated. The nature of the device will be readily comprehended by the following explanation:—Suppose a telescopic tube 17.7 metres long, 1 metre in diameter, devoid of object-glass and lenses, and mounted equatorially, to be closed at both ends by metallic plates or diaphragms, at right angles to the telescopic axis. Suppose the diaphragm at the upper end to be perforated with two circular apertures 200 millimetres in diameter, situated one above the other in the vertical line, 360 millimetres from centre to centre; and suppose a third circular perforation whose area is one-fifth of the apparent area of the solar disc, viz. 72.6 millimetres diameter, to be made on either side of the vertical line. Suppose, lastly, that the diaphragm which closes the lower end of the tube be perforated with three small apertures 6 millimetres in diameter, whose centres correspond exactly with the centres of the three large perforations in the upper diaphragm. The tube being then directed towards the sun, and actiftometers applied below the three small apertures iii the lower diaphragm, it will be evident that two of these instruments will, after due exposure to a clear sun, indicate maximum solar intensity, say 35° C, while the actinometer applied in line with the perforation whose area is one-fifth of the apparent area of the solar disc, will indicate 35/5 = 7° C., unless the central portion of the solar disc radiates more powerfully towards the earth than the rest, in which case a higher intensity than 7° C. will be indicated by the actinometer referred to. It will be readily understood that the solar rays entering through the perforations at the upper end of the tube, converge at the lower end and pass through the small perforations, causing maximum indication of the focal actinometers as stated. Now, suppose that a circular plate, the area of which is exactly 4/5 of the apparent area of the sun, viz. 145.2 millimetres diameter, be inserted concentrically in either of the two large perforations of the diaphragm at the top of the telescopic tube. The apparent diameter of the sun being as before stated 162.4 millimetres, it will be perceived that the inserted plate will only partially exclude the solar radiation, and that the rays from a zone 1′ 42″ wide will pass outside the said plate, converging in the form of a hollow cone at the lower end of the tube, and there enter the respective actinometer. The indication of the latter will then show the thermal energy transmitted by radiation from a zone whose mean width extends 49″from the sun's border. It should be particularly observed that the three focal actinometers employed will be acted upon simultaneously by the converged rays, (1) from the entire area of the solar disc, (2) from a central region containing 1/5 of the area, and (3) from a zone at the border containing also 1/5 of the area of the solar disc. It is scarcely necessary to point out that an accurate comparison of the intensity of the radiant heat emanating from the central part and from the sun's border calls for simultaneous observation, in order to avoid the errors resulting from change of zenith distance and variation of atmospheric absorption during the investigation. The great advantage of obtaining also a simultaneous indication of the intensity traismitted by radiation from the entire solar disc is self-evident, since this indication serves as an effectual check on the observed intensities emanating from the centre and from the border. The latter obviously must be less, while the former must be greater, for a given area, than the indication of the focal actinometer which receives the radiation of the entire solar disc.
multidisciplinary sciences