Abstract:The argument of this article is threefold. First, the article argues that from its rise in the sixteenth century to our own time, the advancement of modern physics as mathematical-experimental science has been defined by the invention of new mathematical structures. Second, the article argues that quantum theory, especially following quantum mechanics, gives this thesis a radically new meaning by virtue of the following two features: on the one hand, quantum phenomena are defined as essentially different from those found in all previous physics by purely physical features; and on the other, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory are defined by purely mathematical postulates, which connect them to quantum phenomena strictly in terms of probabilities, without, as in all previous physics, representing or otherwise relating to how these phenomena physically come about. While these two features may appear discordant, if not inconsistent, I argue that they are in accord with each other, at least in certain interpretations (including the one adopted here), designated as "reality without realism", RWR, interpretations. This argument also allows this article to offer a new perspective on a thorny problem of the relationships between continuity and discontinuity in quantum physics. In particular, rather than being concerned only with the discreteness and continuity of quantum objects or phenomena, quantum mechanics and quantum field theory relate their continuous mathematics to the irreducibly discrete quantum phenomena in terms of probabilistic predictions while, at least in RWR interpretations, precluding a representation or even conception of how these phenomena come about. This subject is rarely, if ever, discussed apart from previous work by the present author. It is, however, given a new dimension in this article which introduces, as one of its main contributions, a new principle: the mathematical complexity principle.

Editor's column (on an article by Jaffe and Quinn)

Editors' remarks (on two complexity theory surveys in the Bulletin)

Some Minimal Notes on Notation and Minima: A Comment on "How Particular is the Physics of the Free Energy Principle?" by Aguilera, Millidge, Tschantz, and Buckley

An Investigation on the Basic Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by Using the Clifford Algebra

Overview of "Structure behind Mechanics"

"In Mathematical Language": On Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Foundations

In defense of real quantum theory

The utterly prosaic connection between physics and mathematics

Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. Algebraic and geometric approaches

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman

The Master Equation: General Discussion

A neo-Kantian explanation of the applicability of mathematics to physics

On matrix elements of the vector physical quantities and methods of angular momentum in quantum mechanics

Shut up and let me think. Or why you should work on the foundations of quantum mechanics as much as you please

The geometrization of quantum mechanics, frozen stars, the Bohm–Poisson and nonlinear Klein–Gordon equations

Delirium Quantum

The Separability Problem in Quantum Mechanics: Insights from Research on Axiomatics and Human Language

What is Time? A New Mathematico- Physical and Information Theoretic Approach

A short introduction to the quantum formalism[s]

A Moonshine Dialogue in Mathematical Physics

Essay: Quantum Sensing with Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Platforms for Fundamental Physics