Abstract:figure legend Just as a tuning knob provides incremental adjustability that is easily accessible and readily reversible, replication slippage at tandem‐repetitive DNA provides a practically inexhaustible supply of abundant variation with minimal cost to fitness. This is an example of a 'mutation protocol', a genetic pattern implementing a bet‐hedging strategy against the ever‐present risk posed by environmental uncertainty – a function analogous to that provided by sexual reproduction. Constraints imposed by mutation protocols minimize risk so that mutations with a reasonable probability for beneficial effect can be more freely and abundantly produced. Mutation protocols can perhaps be best understood as the product of selection at the level of populations, although gene‐level selection may be adequate. Because the universe of possible DNA sequences is inconceivably vast, organisms have evolved mechanisms for exploring DNA sequence space while substantially reducing the hazard that would otherwise accrue to any process of random, accidental mutation. One such mechanism is meiotic recombination. Although sexual reproduction imposes a seemingly paradoxical 50% cost to fitness, sex evidently prevails because this cost is outweighed by the advantage of equipping offspring with genetic variation to accommodate environmental vicissitudes. The potential adaptive utility of additional mechanisms for producing genetic variation has long been obscured by a presumption that the vast majority of mutations are deleterious. Perhaps surprisingly, the probability for adaptive variation can be increased by several mechanisms that generate mutations abundantly. Such mechanisms, here called 'mutation protocols', implement implicit 'constraints that deconstrain'. Like meiotic recombination, they produce genetic variation in forms that minimize potential for harm while providing a reasonably high probability for benefit. One example is replication slippage of simple sequence repeats (SSRs); this process yields abundant, reversible mutations, typically with small quantitative effect on phenotype. This enables SSRs to function as adjustable 'tuning knobs'. There exists a clear pathway for SSRs to be shaped through indirect selection favouring their implicit tuning‐knob protocol. Several other molecular mechanisms comprise probable components of additional mutation protocols. Biologists might plausibly regard such mechanisms of mutation not primarily as sources of deleterious genetic mistakes but also as potentially adaptive processes for 'exploring' DNA sequence space.

Adaptation through stochastic switching into transient mutators in finite asexual populations

Interplay between Pleiotropy and Secondary Selection Determines Rise and Fall of Mutators in Stress Response

Mutator-driven Continuous Genome Evolution of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Stress-induced mutagenesis and complex adaptation

The Effect of Mutators on Adaptability in Time-Varying Fitness Landscapes

Modulation of Base Specific Mutation and Recombination Rates Enables Functional Adaptation within the Context of the Genetic Code

Shifting gears: Thermodynamics of genetic information storage suggest stress-dependence of mutation rate, which can accelerate adaptation

Entangled Evolution Model: Application to Adaptive Mutation

Phenotypic switching can speed up biological evolution of microbes

The Influence Of Deleterious Mutations On Adaptation In Asexual Populations

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

experiments uncover a novel mechanism underlying mutation rate evolution in sexually reproducing populations

Adaptive capacity of a DNA polymerase clamp-loader ATPase complex

Fixation probability in a diploid sexually reproducing population

Mutation protocols share with sexual reproduction the physiological role of producing genetic variation within 'constraints that deconstrain'

Adaptation limits ecological diversification and promotes ecological tinkering during the competition for substitutable resources

A simple model describing evolution of genomic GC content with random perturbations in asexually reproducing organisms

Evolutionary dynamics of nascent multicellular lineages

The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?