Abstract:Exposure to environmental stressors, including certain antibiotics, induces stress responses in bacteria. Some of these responses increase mutagenesis and thus potentially accelerate resistance evolution. Many studies report increased mutation rates under stress, often using the standard experimental approach of fluctuation assays. However, single-cell studies have revealed that many stress responses are heterogeneously expressed in bacterial populations, which existing estimation methods have not yet addressed. We develop a population dynamic model that considers heterogeneous stress responses (subpopulations of cells with the response off or on ) that impact both mutation rate and cell division rate, inspired by the DNA-damage response in Escherichia coli (SOS response). We derive the mutant count distribution arising in fluctuation assays under this model and then implement maximum likelihood estimation of the mutation-rate increase specifically associated with the expression of the stress response. Using simulated mutant count data, we show that our inference method allows for accurate and precise estimation of the mutation-rate increase, provided that this increase is sufficiently large and the induction of the response also reduces the division rate. Moreover, we find that in many cases, either heterogeneity in stress responses or mutant fitness costs could explain similar patterns in fluctuation assay data, suggesting that separate experiments would be required to identify the true underlying process. In cases where stress responses and mutation rates are heterogeneous, current methods still correctly infer the effective increase in population mean mutation rate, but we provide a novel method to infer distinct stress-induced mutation rates, which could be important for parameterising evolutionary models. How does environmental stress, especially from antibiotics, affect mutation rates in bacteria? This question has often been examined by estimating mutation rates using fluctuation assays, an experiment dating back to Luria and Delbrück in the 1940s. In this study, we consider variation in stress responses within bacterial populations, as revealed by recent single-cell studies, which is neglected in currently available mutation-rate estimation methods. Our approach involves a population dynamic model inspired by the DNA-damage response in E. coli (SOS response). It accounts for a subpopulation with high expression of the stress response, which increases the mutation rate and decreases the division rate of a cell. We use computer simulations to generate synthetic fluctuation assay data. Notably, we find that over a wide range of scenarios, existing models and our heterogeneous-response model cannot be distinguished using fluctuation assay data alone. This emphasises the need for separate experiments to uncover the true underlying processes. Nevertheless, when stress responses are known to be heterogeneous, our study offers a novel method for accurately estimating mutation rates specifically associated with the high expression of the stress response. Uncovering the heterogeneity in stress-induced mutation rates could be important for predicting the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

Stress-induced mutagenesis and complex adaptation

Interplay between Pleiotropy and Secondary Selection Determines Rise and Fall of Mutators in Stress Response

Shifting gears: Thermodynamics of genetic information storage suggest stress-dependence of mutation rate, which can accelerate adaptation

Mutation rate variability as a driving force in adaptive evolution

Stress-Induced Mutagenesis Can Further Boost Population Success in Static Ecology

Adaptation through stochastic switching into transient mutators in finite asexual populations

The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations

Stress-Induced Mutagenesis: Implications in Cancer and Drug Resistance.

Estimating mutation rates under heterogeneous stress responses

experiments uncover a novel mechanism underlying mutation rate evolution in sexually reproducing populations

Adaptation to complex environments reveals pervasive trade-offs and genomic targets with large pleiotropic effects

Mutations in yeast are deleterious on average regardless of the degree of adaptation to the testing environment

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Temperature effects on life-history trade-offs, germline maintenance and mutation rate under simulated climate warming

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

A shifting mutational landscape in 6 nutritional states: Stress-induced mutagenesis as a series of distinct stress input–mutation output relationships

Exaptation and de novo mutations transcend cryptic variations as drivers of adaptation in yeast

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Costs, benefits and redundant mechanisms of adaption to chronic low-dose stress in yeast

Mutation potentiates migration swamping in polygenic local adaptation