Abstract:Climate change can cause the overlapping gradients of the environment to shift in unique ways, producing future environments that don't exist today. This will create new forces of natural selection, with various potential effects on locally adapted species: Their adaptation can track climate change, or it could lag and cause populations to shrink or go extinct. Using simulations, we describe how outcomes can depend on "genomic architecture"—how many genes influence adaptation (polygenicity), what proportion of those genes is required to make a fit individual (genotypic redundancy), and how close together those genes are in the genome (linkage)—and describe why this can matter for conservation. As climate change advances, environmental gradients may decouple, generating novel multivariate environments that stress wild populations. A commonly invoked mechanism of evolutionary rescue is adaptive gene flow tracking climate shifts, but gene flow from populations inhabiting similar conditions on one environmental axis could cause maladaptive introgression when populations are adapted to different environmental variables that do not shift together. Genomic architecture can play an important role in determining the effectiveness and relative magnitudes of adaptive gene flow and in situ adaptation. This may have direct consequences for how species respond to climate change but is often overlooked. Here, we simulated microevolutionary responses to environmental change under scenarios defined by variation in the polygenicity, linkage, and genetic redundancy of two independent traits, one of which is adapted to a gradient that shifts under climate change. We used these simulations to examine how genomic architecture influences evolutionary outcomes under climate change. We found that climate‐tracking (up‐gradient) gene flow, though present in all scenarios, was strongly constrained under scenarios of lower linkage and higher polygenicity and redundancy, suggesting in situ adaptation as the predominant mechanism of evolutionary rescue under these conditions. We also found that high polygenicity caused increased maladaptation and demographic decline, a concerning result given that many climate‐adapted traits may be polygenic. Finally, in scenarios with high redundancy, we observed increased adaptive capacity. This finding adds to the growing recognition of the importance of redundancy in mediating in situ adaptive capacity and suggests opportunities for better understanding the climatic vulnerability of real populations.

Mutation potentiates migration swamping in polygenic local adaptation

The persistence of locally adapted polymorphisms under mutation swamping

Establishment of a locally adaptive allele in multidimensional continuous space

The genetic architecture of polygenic local adaptation and its role in shaping barriers to gene flow

Conditionally Deleterious Mutation Load Accumulates in Genomic Islands of Local Adaptation but Can Be Purged with Sufficient Genotypic Redundancy

Polygenic dynamics underlying the response of quantitative traits to directional selection

Mutation rate variability as a driving force in adaptive evolution

The best of both worlds: Combining population genetic and quantitative genetic models

Impacts of pleiotropy and migration on repeated genetic adaptation

(Epi)mutation Rates and the Evolution of Composite Trait Architectures

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Local adaptation can cause both peaks and troughs in nucleotide diversity within populations

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Shifting gears: Thermodynamics of genetic information storage suggest stress-dependence of mutation rate, which can accelerate adaptation

Genomic architecture controls multivariate adaptation to climate change

Genomic mutation rates that neutralize adaptive evolution and natural selection

The rate of beneficial mutations surfing on the wave of a range expansion

Evolution under multiallelic migration-selection models.