Abstract:Predicting the adaptation of populations to a changing environment is crucial to assess the impact of human activities on biodiversity. Many theoretical studies have tackled this issue by modeling the evolution of quantitative traits subject to stabilizing selection around an optimum phenotype, whose value is shifted continuously through time. In this context, the population fate results from the equilibrium distribution of the trait, relative to the moving optimum. Such a distribution may vary with the shape of selection, the system of reproduction, the number of loci, the mutation kernel or their interactions. Here, we develop a methodology that provides quantitative measures of population maladaptation and potential of survival directly from the entire profile of the phenotypic distribution, without any a priori on its <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://shape.We" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> investigate two different models of reproduction (asexual and infinitesimal sexual models of inheritance), with general forms of <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://selection.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> particular, we recover that fitness functions such that selection weakens away from the optimum lead to evolutionary tipping points, with an abrupt collapse of the population when the speed of environmental change is too high. Our unified framework furthermore allows highlighting the underlying mechanisms that lead to this phenomenon. More generally, it allows discussing similarities and discrepancies between the two reproduction models, the latter being ultimately explained by different constraints on the evolution of the phenotypic variance. We demonstrate that the mean fitness in the population crucially depends on the shape of the selection function in the sexual infinitesimal model, in contrast with the asexual <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://model.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> the asexual model, we also investigate the effect of the mutation kernel and we show that kernels with higher kurtosis tend to reduce maladaptation and improve fitness, especially in fast changing environments.

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?

Catch Me if You Can: Adaptation from Standing Genetic Variation to a Moving Phenotypic Optimum

Population dynamics models for various forms of adaptation

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Evolution in a Changing Environment

Transitions in optimal adaptive strategies for populations in fluctuating environments

Balancing Population- and Individual-Level Adaptation in Changing Environments

Evolutionary game theory and the adaptive dynamics approach: adaptation where individuals interact

Collective Fluctuations in models of adaptation

Dynamics of lineages in adaptation to a gradual environmental change

Predicting patterns of long-term adaptation and extinction with population genetics

Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations, and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations

Adapt or perish: Evolutionary rescue in a gradually deteriorating environment

Exploiting the adaptation dynamics to predict the distribution of beneficial fitness effects

Dynamics of the distribution of fitness effects during adaptation

Selection-mutation dynamics with asymmetrical reproduction kernels

The balance between intrinsic and ecological fitness defines new regimes in eco-evolutionary population dynamics

Natural selection. I. Variable environments and uncertain returns on investment

The dynamics of adaptation to stress from standing genetic variation and de novo mutations

A birth-death model of ageing: from individual-based dynamics to evolutive differential inclusions

Phenotypic evolution in stochastic environments: The contribution of frequency‐ and density‐dependent selection