Abstract:Abstract Individuals often respond phenotypically to environmental challenges by innovating and adopting novel behavioral variants. Behavioral (or ‘cultural’) variants are defined here as alternative ways to solve adaptive problems, such as finding food or building shelter. In unpredictable environments, individuals must both be able to adapt to current conditions but also to cope with potential changes in these conditions, they must “hedge their evolutionary bets” against the variability of the environment. Here, we loosely apply this idea to the context of behavioral adaptation and develop an evolutionary model, where cultural variants differ in their level of generality, i.e. the range of environmental conditions in which they provide fitness benefits: generalist variants are characterized by large ranges, specialist variants by small ranges. We use a Moran model (with additional learning opportunities) and assume that each individual’s propensity for innovation is genetically determined, while the characteristics of cultural variants can be modified through processes of individual and social learning. Our model demonstrates that flexibly adjusting the level of generality allows individuals to navigate the trade-off between fast and reliable initial adaptation and the potential for long-term improvements. In situations with many (social or individual) learning opportunities, no adjustment of the innovation rate, i.e. the propensity to learn individually, is required to adapt to changed environmental conditions: fast adaptation is guaranteed by solely adjusting the level of generality of the cultural variants. Few learning opportunities, however, require both processes, innovation and trait generality, to work hand in hand. To explore the effects of different modes of innovation, we contrast independent invention and modification and show that relying largely on modifications improves both short-term and long-term adaptation. Further, inaccuracies in social learning provide another source of variant variation that facilitates adaptation after an environmental change. However, unfaithful learning is detrimental to long-term levels of adaptation. Our results demonstrate that the characteristics of cultural variants themselves can play a major role in the adaptation process and influence the evolution of learning strategies.

Evolution in a Changing Environment

Evolutionary Fitness in Variable Environments

A general condition for adaptive genetic polymorphism in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments

Identifying high power breakdowns in accelerating structures with acoustic sensors

Adaptation to a changing environment: what me Normal?

Catch Me if You Can: Adaptation from Standing Genetic Variation to a Moving Phenotypic Optimum

Evolving generalists via dynamic sculpting of rugged landscapes

Evolutionary game theory and the adaptive dynamics approach: adaptation where individuals interact

Trait specialization, innovation, and the evolution of culture in fluctuating environments

A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation

Molecular and cellular bases of adaptation to a changing environment in microorganisms

Dynamics of lineages in adaptation to a gradual environmental change

The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XV. Genetic assimilation, the Baldwin effect, and evolutionary rescue

Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforest Drosophila and European butterflies

Transitions in optimal adaptive strategies for populations in fluctuating environments

Dynamic fitness landscapes: expansions for small mutation rates

Phenotypic evolution in stochastic environments: The contribution of frequency‐ and density‐dependent selection

How intelligence can change the course of evolution

Evolution takes multiple paths to evolvability when facing environmental change

Unifying (simple) models of genetic robustness and evolvability

Evolution in fluctuating environments: A generic modular approach