Abstract:Advances in embedded systems and low-cost gas sensors are enabling a new wave of low-cost air quality monitoring tools. Our team has been engaged in the development of low-cost, wearable, air quality monitors (M-Pods) using the Arduino platform. These M-Pods house two types of sensors - commercially available metal oxide semiconductor (MOx) sensors used to measure CO, O-3, NO2, and total VOCs, and NDIR sensors used to measure CO2. The MOx sensors are low in cost and show high sensitivity near ambient levels; however they display non-linear output signals and have cross-sensitivity effects. Thus, a quantification system was developed to convert the MOx sensor signals into concentrations. We conducted two types of validation studies - first, deployments at a regulatory monitoring station in Denver, Colorado, and second, a user study. In the two deployments (at the regulatory monitoring station), M-Pod concentrations were determined using collocation calibrations and laboratory calibration techniques. M-Pods were placed near regulatory monitors to derive calibration function coefficients using the regulatory monitors as the standard. The form of the calibration function was derived based on laboratory experiments. We discuss various techniques used to estimate measurement uncertainties. The deployments revealed that collocation calibrations provide more accurate concentration estimates than laboratory calibrations. During collocation calibrations, median standard errors ranged between 4.0-6.1 ppb for O-3, 6.48.4 ppb for NO2, 0.28-0.44 ppm for CO, and 16.8 ppm for CO2. Median signal to noise (S / N) ratios for the M-Pod sensors were higher than the regulatory instruments: for NO2, 3.6 compared to 23.4; for O-3, 1.4 compared to 1.6; for CO, 1.1 compared to 10.0; and for CO2, 42.2 compared to 300-500. By contrast, lab calibrations added bias and made it difficult to cover the necessary range of environmental conditions to obtain a good calibration. A separate user study was also conducted to assess uncertainty estimates and sensor variability. In this study, 9 M-Pods were calibrated via collocation multiple times over 4 weeks, and sensor drift was analyzed, with the result being a calibration function that included baseline drift. Three pairs of M-Pods were deployed, while users individually carried the other three. The user study suggested that inter-M-Pod variability between paired units was on the same order as calibration uncertainty; however, it is difficult to make conclusions about the actual personal exposure levels due to the level of user engagement. The user study provided real-world sensor drift data, showing limited CO drift (under -0.05 ppm day(-1)), and higher for O-3 (-2.6 to 2.0 ppb day-1), NO2 (-1.56 to 0.51 ppb day(-1)), and CO2 (-4.2 to 3.1 ppm day(-1)). Overall, the user study confirmed the utility of the M-Pod as a low-cost tool to assess personal exposure.

Low-cost carbon dioxide concentration sensors for assessing air quality in the built environment: an on-site evaluation of their measurement performance

Novel Chemoresistive Sensors for Indoor CO 2 Monitoring: Validation in an Operational Environment

Design and Development of a Flexible, Plug-and-Play, Cost-Effective Tool for on-Field Evaluation of Gas Sensors

Optical portable instrument for the determination of CO2 in indoor environments

Evaluation of Low-Cost CO2 Sensors Using Reference Instruments and Standard Gases for Indoor Use

Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring

Application of the low-cost sensing technology for indoor air quality monitoring: A review

Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring

Characterization of a Commercial Lower-Cost Medium-Precision Non-Dispersive Infrared Sensor for Atmospheric CO2 Monitoring in Urban Areas

Developing a Low-Cost Wearable Personal Exposure Monitor for Studying Respiratory Diseases Using Metal–Oxide Sensors

A Low-Cost Calibration Method for Temperature, Relative Humidity, and Carbon Dioxide Sensors Used in Air Quality Monitoring Systems

Review of the Performance of Low-Cost Sensors for Air Quality Monitoring

Feasibility and Affordability of Low-Cost Air Sensors with Internet of Things for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring in Residential Buildings: Systematic Review on Sensor Information and Residential Applications, with Experience-Based Discussions

Sensors for indoor air quality monitoring and assessment through Internet of Things: a systematic review

Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor (LCS) Network for Long-Term Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 Measurements at Rural Communities in Beijing, China

Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis

Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor

Multi-Sensor Device for Traceable Monitoring of Indoor Environmental Quality

High Performance Colorimetric Carbon Monoxide Sensor for Continuous Personal Exposure Monitoring.

The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring

Low-cost Air Quality Sensing Process: Validation by Indoor-Outdoor Measurements