Abstract:Many low-cost particle sensors are available for routine air quality monitoring of PM 2.5 , but there are concerns about the accuracy and precision of the reported data, particularly in humid conditions. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the Sensirion SPS30 particulate matter (PM) sensor against regulatory methods for measurement of real-time particulate matter concentrations and to evaluate the effectiveness of the Intelligent Air TM sensor pack for remote deployment and monitoring. To achieve this, we co-located the Intelligent Air TM sensor pack, developed at Clemson University and built around the Sensirion SPS30, to collect data from July 29, 2019, to December 12, 2019, at a regulatory site in Columbia, South Carolina. When compared to the Federal Equivalent Methods, the SPS30 showed an average bias adjusted R 2 = 0.75, mean bias error of −1.59, and a root mean square error of 2.10 for 24-hour average trimmed measurements over 93 days, and R 2 = 0.57, mean bias error of −1.61, and a root mean square error of 3.029, for 1-hr average trimmed measurements over 2300 hours when the central 99% of data was retained with a data completeness of 75% or greater. The Intelligent Air TM sensor pack is designed to promote long-term deployment and includes a solar panel and battery backup, protection from the elements, and the ability to upload data via a cellular network. Overall, we conclude that the SPS30 PM sensor and the Intelligent Air TM sensor pack have the potential for greatly increasing the spatial density of particulate matter measurements, but more work is needed to understand and calibrate sensor measurements. Implications: This work adds to the growing body of research that indicates that low-cost sensors of particulate matter (PM) for air quality monitoring has a promising future, and yet much work is left to be done. This work shows that the level of data processing and filtering effects how the low-cost sensors compare to existing federal reference and equivalence methods: more data filtering at low PM levels worsens the data comparison, while longer time averaging improves the measurement comparisons. Improvements must be made to how we handle, calibrate, and correct PM data from low-cost sensors before the data can be reliably used for air quality monitoring and attainment.

Low-cost Air Quality Sensing Process: Validation by Indoor-Outdoor Measurements

Air Pollution Exposure Monitoring Using Portable Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors

Low-Cost Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration: A Survey and Critical Analysis

Low Cost Sensor Network for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring in Residential Houses: Lab and Indoor Tests of Two PM Sensors

Evaluation of a new low-cost particle sensor as an internet-of-things device for outdoor air quality monitoring

Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: an Assessment of Their Suitability for Various Applications

Design and evaluation of a portable PM2.5 monitor featuring a low-cost sensor in line with an active filter sampler

Performance of a Low-Cost Sensor (LCS) Network for Long-Term Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 Measurements at Rural Communities in Beijing, China

Low-cost PM2.5 sensors can help identify driving factors of poor air quality and benefit communities

Characterising Low-Cost Sensors in Highly Portable Platforms to Quantify Personal Exposure in Diverse Environments

Low-Cost Sensor Node for Air Quality Monitoring: Field Tests and Validation of Particulate Matter Measurements

Feasibility of low-cost particulate matter sensors for long-term environmental monitoring: Field evaluation and calibration

From air quality sensors to sensor networks: Things we need to learn

Developing a Cloud-Based Air Quality Monitoring Platform Using Low-Cost Sensors

Low-Cost Sensor System for Air Purification Process Evaluation

Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring

Improving Data Quality of Low-Cost Light-Scattering PM Sensors: Toward Automatic Air Quality Monitoring in Urban Environments

Suitability of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors for Monitoring Ambient Concentrations

A Perspective on Indoor Air Quality Monitoring, Guidelines, and the Use of Various Sensors

Application of the low-cost sensing technology for indoor air quality monitoring: A review

Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Network in Munich