Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic module backsheets

Paul Wild,Mariska Wild‐Scholten,Imco Goudswaard,Paul de Wild,Mariska de Wild‐Scholten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3755
2023-11-22
Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications
Abstract:A cradle‐to‐grave life cycle assessment indicates that in comparison with PET and various fluoropolymers‐containing backsheets, polyolefin (PO)‐based backsheets perform best in terms of energy yield, reliability, and environmental impacts. The production and end‐of‐life processing of fluoro‐ and PET‐based backsheets cause substantial environmental impacts regarding climate change and ozone depletion. The lowest GWP per kWh produced is achieved for PO backsheets, irrespective of the EoL technology (incineration or pyrolysis), climate zone, and backsheet pigmentation (transparent or white). Increased deployment of solar photovoltaic (PV) enables the transition to decarbonized energy systems, capable of tempering the dire consequences of global warming. Even though backsheets are very important regarding lifetime energy yield of the PV module, the environmental impacts of their production, use, and end‐of‐life (EoL) processing are largely neglected. As part of a recently finalized Dutch national project EXTENSIBLE (Energy yield assessment of neXT gENeration and SustaInaBLE backsheets), the environmental impacts for 7 different polymeric backsheets have been evaluated via a life cycle assessment (LCA). The selected backsheets include 3 traditional polyethylene terephthalate (PET)‐based backsheets with a fluorine containing outer layer (two white pigmented and one fully transparent). The other 4 backsheets are novel high‐performance polyolefin (PO)‐based backsheets, manufactured by Endurans SolarTM, also including one transparent version. From results of the LCA, it is concluded that in comparison with PET‐based backsheets and fluoropolymer containing backsheets, PO‐based backsheets perform best in terms of energy yield, reliability, and environmental impacts. The production of fluoropolymer‐ and PET‐based backsheets cause substantial environmental impacts, especially regarding climate change and ozone depletion. This conclusion is corroborated by recent literature data. Regarding the EoL phase, it was shown from a theoretical assessment that pyrolysis of the spent backsheets potentially leads to much lower global warming potential (GWP) when compared to incineration, especially for the PO‐based backsheets. Incineration of the shredded and solid backsheet material causes direct emissions of CO2 with a limited heat recovery potential only. Deploying pyrolysis for spent PO‐based backsheets significantly improves their life‐time GWP per kWh produced. Pyrolysis offers the possibility to recover a large part of the PO as an usable pyrolysis oil that might serve as feedstock for chemicals or as transportable liquid fuel for the generation of process heat in recovery boilers, thereby avoiding the use of new fossil resources. EoL pyrolysis (or incineration) of fluoropolymer‐based backsheets is problematic due to the presence of fluorinated hydrocarbons, leading to corrosive and/or toxic products.
materials science, multidisciplinary,physics, applied,energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?