Abstract:Paper products are carbon-intensive and having a huge potential for carbon reduction due to their biomass-oriented characteristics. A uniform standard for total carbon footprint (CF) accounting is vital. However, the existing standards have not yet been unified. Inconsistencies between standards cause difficulties in their use and significantly weaken the credibility and comparability of the carbon footprint of a product (CFP). This work rethought the three most widely used standards (Publicly Available Specification 2050 (PAS2050), Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol), and Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard (ISO14067)) from the life-cycle perspective, and established a more appropriate and comprehensive CF accounting standard for paper products (CFASPP). Sanitary pads were selected as a case study to illustrate the discrepancies between PAS 2050, the GHG Protocol, ISO 14067, and CFASPP, for which the annual production CF results were 1424.60, 1481.08, 1453.57, and 1427.04 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) respectively. The main reasons for the different CF results were the cut-off criteria and the inclusion or exclusion of carbon storage, delayed emissions, and energy recovery. Each element increased or decreased 22.57 (carbon storage), 29.96 (cut-off criteria), 10.4 (delayed emissions), and 27.52 (incineration with energy recovery) tons of CO2e in the results. With increasing demand, these discrepancies will become increasingly significant and may lead to corporations shouldering more or less carbon emission responsibilities by selecting different standards, which will challenge the fairness of product carbon neutrality management. CFASPP covers all paper product life-cycle stages and places greater emphasis on the aspects of carbon storage, delayed emissions, and energy recovery in incineration, which cannot be ignored for the CF accounting of paper products and other biomass-oriented products. This study aims to provide a more applicable and comprehensive guide for corporations to evaluate the CF of paper products, and to provide a reference for the construction of a carbon-neutral evaluation system.

Carbon emissions analysis of the pulp molding industry: a comparison of dry-press and wet-press production processes

Uncovering Energy Use, Carbon Emissions and Environmental Burdens of Pulp and Paper Industry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Calculation and Analysis of Total Carbon Emission for China Packaging Industry

Estimating carbon emissions from the pulp and paper industry: A case study

Environmental Performance of Straw-Based Pulp Making: A Life Cycle Perspective.

Calculating and Analyzing Carbon Emission Factors of Prefabricated Components

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Plastic Bottle Blow Mold Based on Product Life Cycle for Managing the Mold Industry's Carbon Emission

Mixed-Framework-Based Energy Optimization of Chemi-Mechanical Pulping

Carbon footprint and techno-economic analysis to decarbonize the production of linerboard via fuel switching in the lime kiln and boiler: Development of a marginal abatement cost curve

A new era of straw-based pulping? Evidence from a carbon metabolism perspective

Extended Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis for the Low-Carbon Tobacco Industry

Rethinking the paper product carbon footprint accounting standard from a life-cycle perspective

Modelling CF of Tobacco Industry Based on PLC Across the Supply Chain

Environmental and economic analysis of the transformation of paper mill sludge treatment technologies in China

Country-specific net-zero strategies of the pulp and paper industry

Carbon Footprint Assessment and Certification of Al-PE-Pa Complex Package

Analysis and Calculation of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of Prefabricated Buildings

Study on Carbon Emission Measurement and Influencing Factors for Prefabricated Buildings at the Materialization Stage Based on LCA

Carbon reduction in cement industry - An indigenized questionnaire on environmental impacts and key parameters of life cycle assessment (LCA) in China

The Effects of Different Management and Processing Methods on the Carbon Footprint of Chinese Hickory

Carbon Emission Accounting Model of Three-Stage Mechanical Products for Manufacturing Process