Abstract:The capability of machine learning methods for identifying and separating artifacts that appear in a typical X‐ray diffraction image is demonstrated.In situ synchrotron high‐energy X‐ray powder diffraction (XRD) is highly utilized by researchers to analyze the crystallographic structures of materials in functional devices (e.g. battery materials) or in complex sample environments (e.g. diamond anvil cells or syntheses reactors). An atomic structure of a material can be identified by its diffraction pattern along with a detailed analysis of the Rietveld refinement which yields rich information on the structure and the material, such as crystallite size, microstrain and defects. For in situ experiments, a series of XRD images is usually collected on the same sample under different conditions (e.g. adiabatic conditions) yielding different states of matter, or is simply collected continuously as a function of time to track the change of a sample during a chemical or physical process. In situ experiments are usually performed with area detectors and collect images composed of diffraction patterns. For an ideal powder, the diffraction pattern should be a series of concentric Debye–Scherrer rings with evenly distributed intensities in each ring. For a realistic sample, one may observe different characteristics other than the typical ring pattern, such as textures or preferred orientations and single‐crystal diffraction spots. Textures or preferred orientations usually have several parts of a ring that are more intense than the rest, whereas single‐crystal diffraction spots are localized intense spots owing to diffraction of large crystals, typically >10 μm. In this work, an investigation of machine learning methods is presented for fast and reliable identification and separation of the single‐crystal diffraction spots in XRD images. The exclusion of artifacts during an XRD image integration process allows a precise analysis of the powder diffraction rings of interest. When it is trained with small subsets of highly diverse datasets, the gradient boosting method can consistently produce high‐accuracy results. The method dramatically decreases the amount of time spent identifying and separating single‐crystal diffraction spots in comparison with the conventional method.

Reproducible x-ray reflectometry optimization: statistical analysis of differential evolution fitting of multilayer structural models

Reverse Optimization Reconstruction Method in Non-Null Aspheric Interferometry

X‐Ray Calc 3: improved software for simulation and inverse problem solving for X‐ray reflectivity

Advancing X-ray scattering metrology using inverse genetic algorithms

X-ray reflectivity with a twist: quantitative time-resolved X-ray reflectivity using monochromatic synchrotron radiation

Quantifying and minimising systematic and random errors in X-ray micro-tomography based volume measurements

Optimization of Image Quality and Acquisition Time for Lab-Based X-ray Microtomography Using an Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm

Artifact Identification in X-ray Diffraction Data using Machine Learning Methods

Deconvoluting Thermomechanical Effects in X-ray Diffraction Data using Machine Learning

Millisecond X‐ray reflectometry and neural network analysis: unveiling fast processes in spin coating

A Novel X-ray Diffraction Procedure for Determining Residual Stresses Around Cold Expanded Holes

Creation of crystal structure reproducing X-ray diffraction pattern without using database

Data-driven approach for synchrotron X-ray Laue microdiffraction scan analysis

New Tricks of the Trade for Crystal Structure Refinement

Distributed Error-Function Roughness in Refl1d Reflectometry Fitting Program

Improved joint X-ray and neutron refinement procedure in Phenix

Artifact identification in X‐ray diffraction data using machine learning methods

Fast and Reliable Probabilistic Reflectometry Inversion with Prior-Amortized Neural Posterior Estimation

Protocol using similarity score and improved shrink-wrap algorithm for better convergence of phase-retrieval calculation in X-ray diffraction imaging

Validating Automated Resonance Evaluation with Synthetic Data