The effect of volume change and stack pressure on solid‐state battery cathodes

Boyang Liu,Shengda D. Pu,Christopher Doerrer,Dominic Spencer Jolly,Robert A. House,Dominic L. R. Melvin,Paul Adamson,Patrick S. Grant,Xiangwen Gao,Peter G. Bruce
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sus2.162
2023-10-10
SusMat
Abstract:This work analyzed the interfacial mechanical degradation between cathode active materials (CAM) and solid‐state electrolytes as an effect of both CAM volume change ratios and high/low stack pressures. While CAM with low volume change ratios can stably cycle without stack pressure, CAM with high volume change ratios can only be stable at high stack pressures. We decoupled the mechanical stability from reactivity during cycling by investigating the cycling performances of model CAMs in a composite solid‐state electrode. Solid‐state lithium batteries may provide increased energy density and improved safety compared with Li‐ion technology. However, in a solid‐state composite cathode, mechanical degradation due to repeated cathode volume changes during cycling may occur, which may be partially mitigated by applying a significant, but often impractical, uniaxial stack pressure. Herein, we compare the behavior of composite electrodes based on Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) (negligible volume change) and Nb2O5 (+4% expansion) cycled at different stack pressures. The initial LTO capacity and retention are not affected by pressure but for Nb2O5, they are significantly lower when a stack pressure of <2 MPa is applied, due to inter‐particle cracking and solid‐solid contact loss because of cyclic volume changes. This work confirms the importance of cathode mechanical stability and the stack pressures for long‐term cyclability for solid‐state batteries. This suggests that low volume‐change cathode materials or a proper buffer layer are required for solid‐state batteries, especially at low stack pressures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?