Abstract:Surgical Innovation, Ahead of Print. BackgroundThe development of emergency department (ED) triage systems remains challenging in accurately differentiating patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP) who are critical and urgent for surgery due to subjectivity and limitations. We use machine learning models to predict emergency surgical abdominal pain patients in triage, and then compare their performance with conventional Logistic regression models.MethodsUsing 38 214 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2022, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥18 years). We utilized routinely available triage data in electronic medical records as predictors, including structured data (eg, triage vital signs, gender, and age) and unstructured data (chief complaints and physical examinations in free-text format). The primary outcome measure was whether emergency surgery was performed. The dataset was randomly sampled, with 80% assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. We developed 5 machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Random Forest (RF). Logistic regression (LR) served as the reference model. Model performance was calculated for each model, including the area under the receiver-work characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curve), as well as the confusion matrix.ResultsOf all the 38 214 acute abdominal pain patients, 4208 underwent emergency abdominal surgery while 34 006 received non-surgical treatment. In the surgery outcome prediction, all 4 machine learning models outperformed the reference model (eg, AUC, 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] in the Light GBM vs. 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] in the reference model), Similarly, most machine learning models exhibited significant improvements in net reclassification compared to the reference model (eg, NRIs of 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105] in the XGBoost), with the exception of the RF model. Decision curve analysis shows that across the entire range of thresholds, the net benefits of the XGBoost and the Light GBM models were higher than the reference model. In particular, the Light GBM model performed well in predicting the need for emergency abdominal surgery with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.ConclusionsMachine learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting emergency abdominal pain surgery compared to traditional models. Modern machine learning improves clinical triage decisions and ensures that critically needy patients receive priority for emergency resources and timely, effective treatment.

Achieving Value by Risk Stratification with Machine Learning Model or Clinical Risk Score in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Cost Minimization Analysis

Development and validation of machine learning models to predict the need for haemostatic therapy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Scoring Systems Used to Predict Mortality in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ED

Prognosis of major bleeding based on residual variables and machine learning for critical patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter study

Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study

Analysis of Risk Factors and Development of Scoring System to Predict Severity of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage patients' survival: A causal inference and prediction study

MH-STRALP: A scoring system for prognostication in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Early prognosis prediction for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the intensive care unit: based on interpretable machine learning

A novel predictive model for Intensive Care Unit admission in Emergency Department patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Risk scores and clinical judgment in predicting outcomes of UGIB

Comparison of Risk Scores for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients

Rules for Predicting Safe Early Hospital Discharge for Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Phase I (derivation Phase) Study

Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China

Prediction of the need for emergency endoscopic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and new score model: a retrospective study

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis and Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding at an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Simplified Machine Learning Models Can Accurately Identify High-Need High-Cost Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China