Abstract:Organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays use red, green, and blue primaries with a higher saturation level to produce larger color gamuts than conventional liquid crystal displays (LCD). No past study, however, experimentally investigated how such a difference between these two display types causes color mismatch and observer metamerism using the most widely used color matching functions (CMFs)-the CIE 1931 2° CMFs-for color calibration and specification. In this study, 50 human observers performed color matching tasks for six color stimuli with a field-of-view of 4.77° between four test displays (i.e., one LCD and three OLED) and a reference OLED display. The color gamuts of the LCD and OLED displays were similar to the sRGB and P3 standard color gamuts. It was found the CIE 1931 2° CMFs cannot accurately characterize the color matches between the LCD and OLED displays, with different chromaticities required to produce matched color appearance. Particularly, when the stimuli had matched color appearance, the chromaticities of the stimuli produced by the LCD display were all shifted towards the -u'+v' direction in the CIE 1976 u'v' chromaticity diagram in comparison to those produced by the OLED display. This suggested that using the CIE 1931 2° CMFs for display calibration would cause the colors shown on OLED displays to have a yellow-green tint if those on LCD displays appear neutral. In addition, a larger degree of observer metamerism was found between the LCD and OLED displays, while little differences, in terms of color mismatch and observer metamerism, were found between the OLED displays. The CIE 2006 2° CMFs were found to have better performance than the CIE 1931 2°, 1964 10°, and 2006 10° CMFs, which could be partially due to the size of the stimulus used in the experiment.

P‐13.9: The MPRT Comparative Study between LCD and OLED Display

Analytical Equation for the Motion Picture Response Time of Display Devices

High Performance LCDs with CRT-like Motion Picture Response Time

Liquid crystal display and organic light-emitting diode display: present status and future perspectives

P-146: A LCD with Submillisecond Motion Picture Response Time

A high-speed OLED monitor for precise stimulation in vision, eye-tracking, and EEG research

Image quality enhancement in variable refresh rate LTPO-based AMOLED displays using a gate in panel voltage compensation scheme

Study of Pixel and Driving Circuits of OLED on Silicon

Performance Comparison between Mini-LED Backlit LCD and OLED Display for 15.6-Inch Notebook Computers

Optimized Electrophoretic Display: Dynamic Multiwaveform Invocation With Localized Time-Division for Low-Flicker Video Display

Improving Flicker of Low-Refresh-Rate Driven Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode Display

10‐2: Research on low brightness Motion blur in low temperature poly‐silicon display field

Study on Display Quality and Visual Fatigue of OLED and QD-LCD

A novel LTPO AMOLED pixel circuit and driving scheme for variable refresh rate

Fast-Response Lcds for Virtual Reality Applications

Nematic LCD with Motion Picture Response Time Comparable to Organic LEDs

AMOLED Pixel Circuit Using LTPO Technology Supporting Variable Frame Rate from 1 to 120 Hz for Portable Displays

Eliminating Hysteresis Effects in Flexible Organic Light-Emitting Diodes

What monitor can replace the cathode-ray tube for visual stimulation to elicit multifocal electroretinograms?

Color mismatch and observer metamerism between conventional liquid crystal displays and organic light emitting diode displays

Transflective LCD