Abstract:In Chinese history, the power relationship between the central and local governments has undergone perennial and critical changes. These changes have given rise to three questions: First, why did some dynasties adopt feudalism at an early stage, merely to curtail the local authority in times of stability? Second, why did the Yuan and Ming dynasties employ a native chieftain system, while the Qing dynasty struggled to bureaucratise the native officers in ethnic minority areas? Third, why were the dynasties of Han ethnicity so hesitant to set up a provincial government while nomadic societies did not view this as a dilemma? Furthermore, why was the Qing dynasty, which was ethnically Han, able to break down these contradictions and create a stable provincial government and provincial state? This paper demonstrates that these changes may be explained by the propensity of the rulers to minimise the ruling risks and constraints that they encountered. Specifically, the ruler’s decision to centralise or decentralise power was constrained by certain challenges, such as fiscal and administrative costs, military technology limitations and political competition. These constraints impelled the ruling class to deviate from the system of prefectures and countries. Under these circumstances, the central government was forced to endure higher social risks and also the potential delegation of power. However, it would reduce the social and delegate risks provided that the constraints were loosened, which triggered the evolution of a power structure between the central and local governments. Another potential driving force behind the changes in the power structure was the dynamic between the social and agency risks. When these risks increased, the central government would readjust the centralisation and decentralisation of power at different government levels to control the rising risks.

Structural-demographic analysis of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912) collapse in China

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

A tale of two population crises in recent Chinese history

Viewing from Another Angle:A Rethinking on the Fall of the Qing Dynasty

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

Volcanic Climate Impacts Can Act As Ultimate and Proximate Causes of Chinese Dynastic Collapse

The Qing Dynasty’s Empire Governance, the Revolution of 1911, and China’s Unitary Multinational State Theory

Collapse of Qing dynasty and Marginalization of Newly Formed Class of Intellectuals

The Expansion of State and the Shrinkage of Civil Society: A Continuing Tendency Emerging in the Qing Period

Climate, disasters, wars and the collapse of the Ming Dynasty

The Late Qing Dynasty Diplomatic Transformation: Analysis from an Ideational Perspective

The reason behind the collapse of Ming

The Identification of East Asian States in the Era of Dynastic Changes from the Ming Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty

Collapse of the Tibetan Empire attributed to climatic shifts: Paleolimnological evidence from the western Tibetan Plateau

Distress and Struggle: Division, Feature and Theoretical Breakthrough in History of Ideas in Qing Dynasty

Agitation of School Destruction at the End of Qing Dynasty and Setback of Early Rual Educational Modernization

Role of the Summer Monsoon Variability in the Collapse of the Ming Dynasty: Evidences From Speleothem Records

The Impact of China's Demographic Transition on Economic Growth and Income Distribution: CGE Modeling with Top-Down Micro-Simulation

Self-Strengthening Movement of Late Qing China: an Intermediate Reform Doomed to Failure

Population, Land, and the Development of the Commodity Economy: Evidence from Qing Dynasty China

The Formation of the Revolution:The Transition of the Last Ten Years of the Qing Dynasty(Part One)