Abstract:This paper examines recent English publications regarding Qing history, especially focusing on the works of Mark Elliott and Pamela Crossley, the two leading scholars in the field. “New Qing History” – a name for recent scholarship on Qing history, which has shared common interests in Manchu language materials and Inner Asian tradition in the Qing empire – has been widely discussed and read in Korea. This group of scholars has challenged the theory of sinicization, and instead highlighted important roles of non-Han people who have long been considered as “inferior barbarians,” especially the Manchus and Mongols, in Chinese history. There are also some disagreements found among these scholars, most notably regarding the question of how to understand ethnicity in the Qing history. Mark Elliott argues that Manchu ethnic identity had played a decisive role in the formation of the Qing state, and the distinctive cultural traits of the Manchu people – or the Manchuness in his word – had remained throughout the dynasty. Pamela Crossley refutes Elliott’s idea that many elements of the Manchuness, such as frugality and martial skills, were in fact products of the Qing imperial ideology. She addresses that the Manchu identity were constantly transformed by the Qing court’s interests. If Elliott explains the Qing history as the Manchu empire, Crossley offers the Qing empire, which included not only the Manchus but other imperial constituencies, such as the Mongol, Tibetan, and Uyghur. Understandings of these divergences in “New Qing History” help examine the ways in which the Qing made its relationships with neighboring countries. As long as the Qing had been transformed itself, its foreign policies changed as well. If the Qing court modified the history of the Manchus and the Mongols, so did to the Choson. As such, various questions raised in “New Qing History” can shed new light on the understanding of the Qing and Choson relationship.

Viewing from Another Angle:A Rethinking on the Fall of the Qing Dynasty

The Formation of the Revolution:The Transition of the Last Ten Years of the Qing Dynasty(Part One)

Qian Xun: "Extraordinary Talent" in Diplomatic History of Late Qing Dynasty——Concurrently on Untenable Assumption of "Zhang Zhidong's Imperial Dream"

Structural-demographic analysis of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912) collapse in China

The reason behind the collapse of Ming

The Re-understanding of the Revolution of 1911

Self-Strengthening Movement of Late Qing China: an Intermediate Reform Doomed to Failure

The Late Qing Dynasty Diplomatic Transformation: Analysis from an Ideational Perspective

The Identification of East Asian States in the Era of Dynastic Changes from the Ming Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty

Collapse of Qing dynasty and Marginalization of Newly Formed Class of Intellectuals

The Qing Dynasty’s Empire Governance, the Revolution of 1911, and China’s Unitary Multinational State Theory

Another Interpretation of Abolishing Imperial Examination and Initiating Schools in the Late Qing Dynasty—— Reading Notes on Zhu Shisan's Diary(1893-1919)

The Dispute over the Emperor Guangxu's Ascending to the Throne

The Movement of Studying Abroad at the End of Qing Dynasty and the Political Situation in 1911

The Renewal of the Multi-National State Tradition and the Dilemma of Republican Politics:Re-examining the Last Qing Emperor's Imperial Edicts of Abdication

Disappointment with the Republican System:The Death of Liang Ji

Succession or Revolution:The Political Discourse and Historical Narrative in Early Tang Dynasty

The Manchu Empire or The Qing Empire? - A Critical Review on ‘New Qing History’ -

The Death of Tang Jiyao in the Context of “Down with Warlords”

The Remaking of an Unified China after the Revolution of 1911(Part Ⅰ)

Systems of Regent and Assistant and Imperial Power Politics in Early Qing Dynasty