Abstract:Objectives This study investigated the similarities and differences in assessing an academic term-paper written by L2 writer between native English-speaking (NES) and Korean professors. It further explored the similarities and differences between NES and Korean evaluators on their perceptions of L2 writer identities. Methods 38 NES and 43 Korean professors rated the term-paper written by a graduate student majoring in applied linguistics according to holistic and analytical scoring methods. The analytical scoring, in particular, included four language areas, such as grammar, vocabulary, content, and organization. A questionnaire was administered to the two groups on their perceptions of author identity. The results from the two groups were compared using the independent t-test, and follow-up interviews were conducted with four NES and four Korean professors to explore the factors of the survey results. Results There was no difference in overall scoring between the two groups. Still, in analytical scoring, the NES professors were strict in organization and content, whereas the Korean professors were strict in grammar. Regarding their perceptions of author identity and their influence on evaluation, NES professors showed more positive attitudes. Concerning the clues of their perceptions, the NES professors' judgment was based on the structure and method of thesis writing. In contrast, the Korean professors recognized the author's identity based on his English proficiency and the breadth of content knowledge. Conclusions The results show that the professors' ratings were influenced by the composition training they previously experienced and their language background. Thus, it suggests that content professors create a rubric suitable for individual courses for appropriate evaluation and share it with their students. It also shows the importance of training students to construct an effective author identity in academic writing.

A comparative analysis of language choices in written peer feedback provided by high- and low-proficiency Japanese EFL students

“Sorry, I don’t good English”: Japanese L2 students’ written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes

Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students' perceptions and preferences

An analysis of written English: assessing characteristics of English writing by Japanese university students through perspectives of World Englishes and English as a lingua franca

Peer–Peer Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and Reflections

EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?

Comparison between Native and Non-Native English Professors on L2 Writing Assessment: A Study of Assessment Areas and Perceptions of Writer Identity

Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing

Assessing the effect of giving and receiving written corrective feedback on improving L2 writing accuracy: does giving and receiving feedback have fair mutual benefit?

The Effect of Different Types of Peer Feedback Provision on EFL Students’ Writing Performance

The Impact of Peer Feedback on Chinese EFL Junior High School Students’ Writing Performance

To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education

A Comparison of Teacher’s and Senior Students’ Feedback : Student Attitudes and Their Writing Improvement

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy

Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision

Attitudes Towards Peer Review and Reaction to Peer Feedback in Chinese EFL Writing Classrooms

Greater coverage vs. deeper processing? Comparing individual and collaborative processing of teacher feedback

Different Sequences of Feedback Types: Effectiveness, Attitudes, and Preferences.

Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proficiency and high-proficiency L2 learners

The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: Using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes