Abstract:Background: Collaborative learning is recognized as an effective learning tool in the classroom. In order to optimize the collaborative learning experience for children within a collaborative partnership, it is important to understand how to match the children by ability level, and whether assigning roles within these dyads is beneficial or not. Aims: The current study investigated the effect of partnering children with different task-specific abilities and assigning or not assigning helping roles within the dyads on the quality of talk used in a collaborative learning task. Sample: The participants in this study comprised 54 year 6 pupils from a Western Sydney government primary school (boys=26, girls=28). The ages ranged from 10 years 10 months to 12 years 4 months with a mean age of 11 years 4 months. Method: The children were formed into 27 single sex dyads of low-middle- and low-high-ability partnerships. In half of each of these dyads the higher ability partner was asked to help the lower ability partner, which was compared with just asking partners to work together. The quality of talk used by the dyads while working collaboratively on the problem-solving task was analysed using a language analysis framework developed by Mercer and colleagues (e.g. Littleton et al., 2005; Mercer, 1994, 1996). Results: Results of this study found that children who worked collaboratively in the low-middle-ability dyad condition demonstrated significantly more high-quality exploratory talk than those in the low-high-ability dyad condition. Although there was no significant difference between dyads who were assigned roles and those who were asked to work together, there was an interaction trend which suggests that low-high-ability dyads, who were given the roles of helper and learner, showed more exploratory talk than dyads who were asked just to work together. Conclusion: Mercer's re-conceptualization of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in terms of the Intermental Development Zone (IDZ), which is reliant on constructive challenging discourse, can potentially provide a platform upon which all learners in the classroom can benefit from collaborative learning experiences.

Peer–Peer Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and Reflections

L2 Proficiency Pairing, Task Type and L1 Use: A Mixed-Methods Study on Optimal Pairing in Dyadic Task-Based Peer Interaction.

Triadic Oral Peer Feedback: Does EFL Learners’ L2 Proficiency Pairing Play a Role?

Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context

Communicative Interaction in Language Learning Tasks among EFL Learners

A comparative analysis of language choices in written peer feedback provided by high- and low-proficiency Japanese EFL students

Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction

Scaffolding in the Second Language Learning of Target Forms in Peer Interaction

Peer Interaction in the Classroom

Effects of dyadic patterns and proficiency pairing on Chinese EFL learners' second language learning in collaborative writing

Towards effective partnerships in a collaborative problem-solving task

Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement

Task Complexity, L2 Proficiency and EFL Learners’ L1 Use in Task-Based Peer Interaction

Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork Setting

Peer-learning in Young Learners English Speaking Tasks: An Ecological Analysis

The role of proficiency and pair formation method in language-related episodes: A study of young CLIL learners’ interaction

Enhancing ESL learner's literacy by peer-assisted learning strategy of online English news

Some benefits of peer–peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task

The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations

Peer Scaffolding among Primary ESL Learners’ Writing Task: Learners’ Behaviors and Triggering Factors

The impact of Danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: A mixed-method investigation