Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Exploring the Nexus of Enterprise Ownership Structure and Food Safety Incidents: Evidence from China

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

Food Safety Controls in Different Governance Structures in China's Vegetable and Fruit Industry

The impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate social responsibility: A new evidence from food industry in China

What Drives the Food Safety Certification: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Food Companies in China

Influential factors and interventions for repeated production violations in food enterprises - Empirical evidence from China

Why do many a-share listed companies eagerly disclose food safety information in China?—from the perspective of financing constraints

Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective

How much state ownership is more conducive to corporate innovation in firms? Evidence from China

Mixed-ownership reform and factor misallocation: Evidence from China

Innovation and export performance of emerging market enterprises: The roles of state and foreign ownership in China

ESG Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms: Does State Ownership Matter?

Food safety risk behavior and social Co-governance in the food supply chain

The impact of food safety regulatory information intervention on enterprises’ production violations in China: a randomized intervention experiment

The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Are State-Owned Enterprises Equally Reliable Information Suppliers? An Examination of the Impacts of State Ownership on Earnings Management Strategies of Chinese Enterprises

Constructing the accountability of food safety as a public problem in China: a document analysis of Chinese scholarship, 2008–2018

How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China