Abstract:Purpose - Since the 2020s, the management philosophy of Chinese firms' ESG has been rapidly established under the leadership of the Chinese government. We empirically analyze the ESG characteristics and effects on corporate value of Chinese firms. Design/methodology/approach - Using OLS and random effect panel regression analysis, we identify ESG determinants. In analyzing the impact on corporate value, likewise a large number of literatures, we adopt a 2SLS methodology using instrumental variables in the reason of endogeneity between ESG and firm value. We analyze using the G2SLS methodology, which is improving the efficiency of the estimation coefficients along with 2SLS. Findings - We find that ESG ratings are high in state-owned and foreign capital invested companies, ESG ratings are low in companies with a high proportion of non-floating stocks which implies information asymmetry. However, there are no significance in the institutional investor's, the major 10 largest shareholders’ and manager’s ownership. Furthermore, we can support most of the hypotheses that ESG ratings will be high in companies with high management performance. ESG ratings are significantly higher in companies with high ROA, rich in cash asset, low debt ratio, and large size. we strongly support the hypothesis that the higher the ESG rating, the higher the firm value, and ESG has a moderating effect on state-owned companies, non-floating shares, the ownership of institutional investors, manager, and the 10 major shareholder. In particular, state-owned companies, the proportion of non-floating shares, and the ownership of the 10 major shareholders have a negative impact on firm value, however, ESG attenuates this negative effect. Research implications or Originality - This study looks forward to enhancing our understanding of ESG characteristics in East Asia.

ESG Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms: Does State Ownership Matter?

The Role of Ownership Structure in the Relationship Between Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from China

State ownership, political connection and ESG performance

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Firm Value: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

The Characteristics of ESG and Effect on Corporate Value of Chinese Firms

ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises

The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure

Does state capital equity affect ESG performance of private firms?—based on the perspective of sustainable development of Chinese enterprises

Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Sustainable Development in China

Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China's mixed ownership reforms

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance of Chinese Multinationals: A Comparison of State- and Non-State-Owned Enterprises

State-Owned Capital Participation and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Can Ownership Structure Improve Environmental Performance in Chinese Manufacturing Firms? the Moderating Effect of Financial Performance

The impact of foreign ownership on corporate ESG performance

Environmental Regulation and Green Innovation: Does State Ownership Matter?

Does the type of ownership control matter? Evidence from China’s listed companies☆

Why Firms Perform Differently in Corporate Social Responsibility? Firm Ownership and the Persistence of Organizational Imprints

ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China

The impact of environmental, social, and governance on corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence based on Chinese a-share listed companies

Foreign Ownership and Corporate ESG Performance