Abstract:We consider an e‐tailer's upstream supplier who wants to encroach into retailing to earn additional revenue. The supplier needs to decide whether or not to enter the retail market by either selling to consumers on the e‐tailer's platform by paying commission fees (agency encroachment) or opening an independent online/offline retail store (direct encroachment). The e‐tailer has private demand information and decides whether or not to share it with the supplier. Two leadership scenarios—the supplier‐leads (i.e., the supplier selects the channel before the e‐tailer decides whether to share information) and the e‐tailer‐leads (i.e., the supplier selects the channel after the e‐tailer decides whether to share information)—are examined. Our main findings are as follows. First, we show that the e‐tailer has no incentive to share information under no encroachment and direct encroachment. Interestingly, this result holds in both leadership scenarios. Second, a medium commission rate gives rise to an equilibrium of agency encroachment with information sharing by the e‐tailer. This equilibrium is more likely to sustain in the supplier‐leads scenario than in the e‐tailer‐leads scenario. Third, agency encroachment brings the supplier the highest sales volume (at retail in the encroaching channel plus on wholesale to the e‐tailer) when the two parties compete in quantity while direct encroachment does so for a price competition. Fourth, supplier encroachment always improves consumer surplus, but it is not necessarily welfare‐improving. Last, we find that the e‐tailer is more willing to share information to induce the supplier to encroach through his agency channel if he has a significant selling cost advantage over the supplier or can endogenously determine the commission rate. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Games of supplier encroachment channel selection and e‐tailer's information sharing

Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms

Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment

Supplier Encroachment and Information Transparency on Fresh Produce E‐commerce Platform: Impacts on the Traditional Channel

Encroachment by a better-informed manufacturer

Supplier Encroachment with Multiple Retailers

Agency Selling or Reselling: E-tailer Information Sharing with Supplier Offline Entry

Inducing Supply Chain Transparency through Supplier Encroachment

Demand Forecast Information Sharing with Manufacturer Encroachment

Supplier Encroachment in Competitive Supply Chains

Acquisition Transparency and Induced Supplier Encroachment

Information Sharing in an E-Tailing Supply Chain for Fresh Produce with Supplier Encroachment

Information Sharing Strategies in a Hybrid-Format Online Retailing Supply Chain

Demand Forecast Sharing for a Dominant Retailer with Supplier Encroachment and Quality Decisions

Supplier encroachment in the presence of asymmetric retail competition

Supplier Encroachment with a Dual‐Purpose Retailer

Should a supplier engage in the marketplace? an equilibrium analysis in a hybrid-format supply chain

Information Acquisition and Sharing Strategies of Supply Chain with Supplier Encroachment Considering Signaling Effect

The dark side of bilateral encroachment within a supply chain

Eliminate Demand Information Disadvantage in a Supplier Encroachment Supply Chain with Information Acquisition

Impact of Capital Position and Financing Strategies on Encroachment in Supply Chain Dynamics