Abstract:Although the issue of cooperative emission reduction in supply chains has been extensively studied, there is little literature that considers the impact of consumers' reference low-carbon effect and product low-carbon goodwill on their purchasing behavior in the issue of dual-channel supply chain cooperative emission reduction. In order to explore the impact of consumers' reference low-carbon effect and product low-carbon goodwill on the balanced emission reduction decisions and profit of dual-channel supply chain members, we establish a dual-channel supply chain emission reduction dynamic optimization model, use differential game theory to solve the manufacturer's optimal emission reduction investment and the retailer's optimal low-carbon publicity investment strategies under four different decision scenarios, and analyze them in detail. In addition, we also design an effective low-carbon publicity cost-sharing contract to achieve coordination of the supply chain. The research results show that the equilibrium strategies of the manufacturer and retailer and the overall profit of the supply chain under the centralized decision scenario are better than those of decentralized decision scenario. When the initial reference low-carbon level is low, the online and offline reference low-carbon effects are beneficial to the manufacturer and retailer. When the initial low-carbon goodwill is high, it is beneficial for both the manufacturer and retailer to increase consumer recognition of low-carbon goodwill. When the ratio of low-carbon publicity cost sharing provided by the manufacturer to the retailer is within a reasonable range, the cost-sharing contract can reduce the double marginal effect and achieve supply chain coordination.

On breadth and depth of climate agreements with pledge-and-review bargaining

Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements and Altruistic Preferences

Cooperation is Essential for 2 Centigrade Degrees Target: a New Perspective from the Dynamic Game Model

A model intercomparison of the welfare effects of regional coalitions for ambitious climate mitigation targets

Transfers in climate action teams

Rethinking Climate Agreements: Self-Enforcing Strategies for Emission Reduction Through Sanctions

Decentralized voluntary agreements do not reduce emissions in a climate change experiment

Equity‐efficiency tradeoffs in international bargaining

Effective climate clubs require ambition, leverage and insulation: Theorizing issue linkage in climate change and trade

Dynamic bargaining game DEA carbon emissions abatement allocation and the Nash equilibrium

International environmental agreements when countries behave morally

Differential game analysis of joint emission reduction decisions under mixed carbon policies and CEA

Improving International Climate Policy via Mutually Conditional Binding Commitments

The importance of health co-benefits under different climate policy cooperation frameworks

Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China

Incentives and Emission Responsibility Allocation in Supply Chains

A paradox of coalition building in public good provision

Dynamic Optimization and Coordination of Cooperative Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Reference Low-Carbon Effect and Low-Carbon Goodwill

Carbon emission reduction decisions of supply chain members under cap-and-trade regulations: A differential game analysis

Climate Policy under Spatial Heat Transport: Cooperative and Noncooperative Regional Outcomes

Social equity in international environmental agreements