Abstract:It is difficult to achieve ideal results only based on a single subject for governing global climate issues, and the synergy co-governance of multiple subjects may address this difficulty. Based on the different resource advantages and interests of China, the US, and the EU, the roles they assume and play in the governance of global climate issues are different. In this study, we explore the competition and interaction between the carbon neutral strategies of China, the US, and the EU under different scenarios through the dynamic evolution game model and use simulation analysis to simulate the impact of changes in the initial values of the main parameters on the evolution trend of the three-party game strategy under a variety of scenarios, in order to explore the dynamic evolution path of the behavior of the three parties in the game and the stabilization strategy. The result of this study suggests that: (1) The strategic choices of different participants in global climate governance interact with each other. (2) The ideal strategy combination may be achieved when the carbon neutral strategy game is carried out between China, the US, and the EU under certain conditions. (3) If the initial willingness to cooperate changes, with the Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS) unchanged, only the convergence rate of the evolutionary game subject's strategy choices will be affected. (4) The result of the sensitivity analysis suggests that certain policy conflicts exist in the evolution process of carbon neutrality strategies in China, the US, and the EU. Besides, the evolution path will deviate from the ideal state with the change in the benefits of different entities. The conclusion of this study can provide a valuable reference for China, the US, and the EU to divide responsibilities and form a consensus in the synergy governance mechanism, such that the effectiveness of global climate governance can be increased.

Cooperation is Essential for 2 Centigrade Degrees Target: a New Perspective from the Dynamic Game Model

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Simulation of Climate Negotiation Strategies Between China and the U.S. Based on Game Theory

Climate Collective Risk Dilemma with Feedback of Real-Time Temperatures

Game theoretic approach to global climate control

Dynamic Grouping for Climate Change Negotiation: Facilitating Cooperation and Balancing Interests through Effective Strategies

Motivation of Climate Change Investment and Risk Exposure

How Cooperation and Competition Arise in Regional Climate Policies: RICE as a Dynamic Game

Research on the Synergy Mechanism of Multiple Subjects in Global Climate Governance: Based on the Perspective of the Evolutionary Game of Carbon Neutral Strategy Between China, the US, and the EU

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

An analysis of optimal equilibrium in the carbon trading market - From a tripartite evolutionary game perspective

Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks under an external incentive mechanism

Carbon Offsetting-Driven Multi-Actor Low-Carbon Collaborative Evolutionary Game Analysis

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Low-Carbon Transformation of Construction Enterprises Under the "Dual Carbon" Target

Evolution of Global Cooperation Driven by Risks

Climate Policy under Spatial Heat Transport: Cooperative and Noncooperative Regional Outcomes

Inter-Governmental Game Model And Policy In The Transfer Of Climate-Sound Technologies

Domestic Regional Synergy in Achieving National Climate Goals—The Role of Comparative Advantage in Emission Reduction

Evolutionary Game Theoretic Analysis of Low Carbon Investment in Supply Chains under Governmental Subsidies

Spontaneous Formation of Evolutionary Game Strategies for Long-Term Carbon Emission Reduction Based on Low-Carbon Trading Mechanism

Strategies of Participants in the Carbon Trading Market—An Analysis Based on the Evolutionary Game