Abstract:Addressing questions of equitable contributions to emission reductions is important to facilitate ambitious global action on climate change within the ambit of the Paris Agreement. Several large developing regions with low historical contributions to global warming have a strong moral claim to a large proportion of the remaining carbon budget (RCB). However, this claim needs to be assessed in a context where the RCB consistent with the long-term temperature goal (LTTG) of the Paris Agreement is rapidly diminishing. Here we assess the potential tension between the moral claim to the remaining carbon space by large developing regions with low per capita emissions, and the collective obligation to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. Based on scenarios underlying the IPCC's 6th Assessment Report, we construct a suite of scenarios that combine the following elements: (a) two quantifications of a moral claim to the remaining carbon space by South Asia, and Africa, (b) a 'highest possible emission reduction' effort by developed regions (DRs), and (c) a corresponding range for other developing regions (ODR). We find that even the best effort by DRs cannot compensate for a unilateral claim to the remaining carbon space by South Asia and Africa. This would put the LTTG firmly out of reach unless ODRs cede their moral claim to emissions space and, like DRs, pursue highest possible emission reductions, which would also constitute an inequitable outcome. Furthermore, regions such as Latin America would need to provide large-scale negative emissions with potential risks and negative side effects. Our findings raise important questions of perspectives on equity in the context of the Paris Agreement including on the critical importance of climate finance. A failure to provide adequate levels of financial support to compensate large developing regions to emit less than their moral claim will put the Paris Agreement at risk.

Decentralized voluntary agreements do not reduce emissions in a climate change experiment

Rethinking Climate Agreements: Self-Enforcing Strategies for Emission Reduction Through Sanctions

Economic experiments support Ostrom's polycentric approach to mitigating climate change

The consequences of non-participation in the Paris Agreement

Climate Pledges Versus Commitment: Are Policy Actions of Middle-East and North African Countries Consistent with Their Emissions Targets?

A model intercomparison of the welfare effects of regional coalitions for ambitious climate mitigation targets

Unilateral or Reciprocal Climate Policy? Experimental Evidence from China

An Emissions Offset Strategy to Accomplish 2 °C Long-Term Mitigation Goals in the European Union

Assessing the impact of costly punishment and group size in collective-risk climate dilemmas

Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy

Does Pricing Carbon Mitigate Climate Change? Firm-Level Evidence from the European Union Emissions Trading System

Strategic Behavior, Private Information, and Decentralization in the European Union Emissions Trading System

Self-enforcing Strategies to Deter Free-Riding in the Climate Change Mitigation Game and Other Repeated Public Good Games

Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming

Can US multi-state climate mitigation agreements work? A perspective from embedded emission flows

A well-timed switch from local to global agreements accelerates climate change mitigation

Comparing climate pledges and eco-taxation in a networked agricultural supply chain organisation

Differentiated Responsibilities and Prosocial Behavior in Climate Change Mitigation: Behavioral Evidence from the United States and China

Feasible climate policies in a democracy with a climate-denying party

Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach

Self-organized global control of carbon emissions