Abstract:Objective:Pathogenic microbes may be transmitted directly from the orthodontist to the patient or from the patient to the doctor, and indirectly from patient to patient. The latter may occur via contaminated instruments or surfaces, and is referred to as cross-contamination. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent of bacterial contamination of orthodontic pliers and the efficacy of the disinfection techniques applied after clinical use. We also sought to examine under standardized conditions the virucidal, bactericidal and fungicidal effects of disinfection techniques used in practice.Materials and Methods:The efficacy of various disinfection methods was determined after clinical use in-vivo on 10 test subjects and in-vitro with deliberate contamination. The following disinfection methods were tested:1. Iso-Septol spray2. Incidur® spray3. Trough disinfection in combination with 5% Sekusept® Plus solution4. Ultrasound bath in combination with 5% Sekusept® Plus solution5. Thermal disinfectionFor in-vitro contamination we used the test organisms Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Coxsackie virus B4, HSV 1, and Adenovirus type 5. The tests were carried out six to eight times for each organism. The Weingart pliers and distalend cutters were tested. The criteria for effective disinfection were a reduction in infectiosity of five log steps (for bacteria and fungi) or four log steps (viruses). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon and Whitney U-test.Results:The presence of contamination following clinical use was not adequately eliminated with all disinfection methods. The spray methods exhibited shortcomings in disinfection. For the type of contamination defined, trough disinfection with 5% Sekusept® Plus and the Incidur® and Iso-Septol spray disinfection methods provided insufficient disinfection. Conversely, the ultrasound bath with 5% Sekusept® Plus solution and steam disinfection met the criteria for effective disinfection for all microbes. No statistically significant difference was found between the oiled and unoiled states. In some cases, there were slightly higher rates of contamination with the Weingart pliers as with the distalend cutters. However, these were not statistically significant.Conclusions:It should be possible to disinfect lipophilic viruses and the usual bacterial infections adequately with all methods, provided that the use of sprays and trough disinfection is preceded by cleaning with brush and water, followed by drying. With hydrophilic viruses, however, the spray and trough disinfection methods are limited in their efficacy and cannot be considered adequate. Exclusively chemical methods are therefore less effective than thermal or physical-chemical methods.Thermal disinfection and the ultrasound bath in combination with 5% Sekusept® Plus are clearly superior to spray disinfection and trough disinfection alone. The ultrasound bath and thermal disinfection can therefore be recommended for the disinfection of orthodontic pliers. We recommend that the pliers be cleaned beforehand due to their uneven surfaces.

Disinfection of Surgical Instruments Using a Hydrodynamic System with Ozonated Water and Ultrasound: Preliminary Study

Ozonated water in disinfection of hospital instrument table

STUDY ON WASHING METHOD OF MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENT

Impact of water quality on reprocessing equipment: Assessment of neurosurgical instruments cleaning and biofilm formation in hospital pipes

Development and Improvement of an Effective Method for Air and Surfaces Disinfection with Ozone Gas as a Decontaminating Agent

Effective Disinfection of Orthodontic Pliers

Highly effective decontamination in a hospital environment: An easy‐to‐operate, low‐cost prototype

Evaluation of Antimicrobial-Antibiofilm Activity of a Hydrogen Peroxide Decontaminating System Used in Dental Unit Water Lines

Evaluating the Potential, Applicability, and Effectiveness of Ozone Sterilization Process for Medical Devices

Contamination of equipment and surfaces in the operating room anesthesia workspace: a cross-sectional study

An alternative approach for the decontamination of hospital settings

Management Quality of Surgical Instrument and Influence of Cleaning and Sterilization on the Surgical Outcomes of the Patient: A Review

Synergetic Effects of Ultrasound and Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water Against Staphylococcus Aureus Evaluated by Flow Cytometry and Electron Microscopy.

De-Epithelization of the Human Amniotic Membrane Using a System Involving Ozonated Water and Ultrasound

Enhancement of microbicidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants when combined with ultrasound technology

Effectiveness of a combined UV-C and ozone treatment in reducing healthcare-associated infections in hospital facilities

Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections by Monitoring the Cleanliness of Medical Devices and Other Critical Points in a Sterilization Service

In Vitro and In Vivo Translational Insights into the Intraoperative Use of Antiseptics and Lavage Solutions Against Microorganisms Causing Orthopedic Infections

Disinfection of otorhinolaryngological endoscopes with electrolyzed acid water: A cross-sectional and multicenter study

Performance of an Autonomous Sanitary Sterilisation Ultraviolet Machine (ASSUM) on terminal disinfection of surgical theaters and rooms of an intensive-intermediate care unit

Sonochemical disinfection of municipal wastewater