Impact of surgical management of upper tract urothelial cancer in octogenarians: A population-based study
Shu Wang,Michael Phelan,Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000164
Abstract:Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive disease with a high progression rate. The standardmanagement for this disease is nephroureterectomy. Nephron sparing nonradical surgery is an alternative therapeutic approach. In men with limited life expectancy, the potential harm of UTUC progression must be weighed against surgical morbidity and mortality, and thus, more conservative approaches may be selected. This study aims to investigate the comparative benefits of radical and conservative surgical management in patients older than 80 years with localized UTUC. Materials and methods: A search was conducted in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients older than 80 years who were diagnosed with localized (T1-2N0M0) cancer in the renal pelvis or ureter as the only malignancy from 2004 to 2015. Patients were divided into 3 therapeutic groups: no surgery, local intervention (ie, local tumor excision or segmented ureterectomy), and radical surgery (nephroureterectomy). Demographic and cancer-related parameter data were collected. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate predictors for surgical treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze survival outcomes. Results: Data from 774 patients were analyzed, including 205 in the no-surgery group, 181 in the local intervention group, and 388 in the radical surgery group. Older, African American patients with T1 stage disease were less likely to receive surgical treatment. Among surgically treated patients, renal pelvic tumors, and high-grade and T2 stage disease were associated with radical resection. Surgically treated patients had a longer median overall survival (OS) than in those treated nonsurgically (13, 35, and 47 months in no-surgery, local intervention, and radical surgery groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Although surgically treated patients demonstrated higher 5-year OS (8.8% [no surgery], 23.2% [local intervention], and 23.5% [radical surgery], p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) (41.0%[no surgery], 69.1%[local intervention], and 72.9%[radical surgery]; p < 0.001) than in those treated nonsurgically, no significant differences were found between the local intervention and radical surgery groups (p > 0.05). Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, surgical treatments, including both nonradical and radical resection, were independently associated with improved OS and DSS after controlling for age, marital status, tumor grade, and radiation status. Conclusions: Patients older than 80 years with localized UTUC who undergo surgery demonstrate longer survival. Radical and nonradical resections seemto have similar OS and DSS outcomes. Thus, when clinically indicated in this population, a more conservative surgical approach may be reasonable.