Abstract:In the contemporary information ecosystem, misinformation and disinformation pose significant challenges to public understanding and the integrity of democratic processes.Addressing these challenges requires both comprehending the nature of false information as well as the psychological underpinnings that make individuals susceptible to it. The articles included in this Research Topic collectively explore motivation-based strategies as a means of counteracting the dissemination and spread of misinformation and disinformation, emphasizing the psychological mechanisms that drive belief in false information and how they can be leveraged to enhance resilience against such threats. Each article addresses different facets of motivation and its impact on misinformation processing, yet they converge on the central theme that motivation is a powerful force in shaping individuals' receptivity to information and their ability to discern truths from falsehoods. The studies delve into ideological, cultural, emotional, and cognitive motivations, demonstrating how these can either facilitate or hinder the acceptance of misinformation and disinformation.In Ideological Predictors of Anti-Science Attitudes: Exploring the Impact of Group Based Dominance and Populism in North America and Western Europe, Remsö and Renström highlight how ideological motivations, such as group-based dominance, populism, symbolic ideology, and scientific literacy can foster skepticism towards science. Although the effect of populism tends to vary, their study finds group-based dominance to be a strong predictor of antiscience attitudes. Remsö and Renström's work underlines how deeply ingrained beliefs can lead to the rejection of scientific facts and stresses how addressing these ideological roots is crucial in efforts to counter the formation and spread of misinformation.to Conspiracy Beliefs, hypothesize that, rather than entertainment value, the perception of evil intentions by conspirators mediates beliefs in conspiracy theories and find that such perceptions play a key role in supporting implausible beliefs in the absence of credible evidence. The researchers note how emotional motivations, particularly those rooted in moral judgments, appear to be significant predictors of misinformation acceptance and stress how addressing the influence the accuracy of misinformation detection, they find that a state of metacognitive ease enhances individuals' confidence and accuracy in detecting misinformation, highlighting the role of internal efficacy as a motivational factor in promoting critical evaluation of information. By emphasizing the roles of processing fluency and internal efficacy, their work opens up new avenues for developing more effective strategies for combating the spread of disinformation in our increasingly complex information landscape.

Who Shares Misinformation on Social Media? A Meta-analysis of Individual Traits Related to Misinformation Sharing

Stumble on information or misinformation? Examining the interplay of incidental news exposure, narcissism, and new media literacy in misinformation engagement

Motivation and personality: A comparative study of social media use and misinformation in the United States and China

Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Deliberate and accidental sharing, motivations and positive schizotypy

Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation

Attention and misinformation sharing on social media

Understanding health misinformation sharing among the middle-aged or above in China: roles of social media health information seeking, misperceptions and information processing predispositions

Considering information-sharing motives to reduce misinformation

Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention

Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study

Spreaders vs victims: The nuanced relationship between age and misinformation via FoMO and digital literacy in different cultures

Exploring the Links between Personality Traits and Suscep;bility to Disinformation

Examining the association between social media fatigue, cognitive ability, narcissism and misinformation sharing: cross-national evidence from eight countries

Users' unverified information-sharing behavior on social media: The role of reasoned and social reactive pathways

Editorial: Motivation-based approaches to countering mass-mediated misinformation

Media Literacy Interventions Improve Resilience to Misinformation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Overall Effect and Moderating Factors

Encountering misinformation online: antecedents of trust and distrust and their impact on the intensity of Facebook use

Explaining Health Misinformation Belief through News, Social, and Alternative Health Media Use: The Moderating Roles of Need for Cognition and Faith in Intuition

Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media

Why do People Share Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

How People Process Different Types of Health Misinformation: Roles of Content Falsity and Evidence Type